Intention to cause another person someharm OR was subjectivelyreckless as to whether anotherpersonsufferedsomeharm.
Maliciously meaning act and relevance in GBH
Cunningham (1957) - maliciously did not require ill will towards injured person
Causation must be proven how in GBH
In fact and in law
4 ways GBH can be established
DA, CA, IA, Omission
Inflict in GBH - meaning and case
R v Burstow 1997 - Inflict does NOT require assault or battery. Causation by D to end consequence must be proven.
How to confirm injuries as GBH?
Use R v Smith and Saunders to justifiy injuries
STI trasmission knowingly = GBH
R v Dica (2004)
Psychiatric injury can be GBH.
R v Burstow (1997).
Severity of injuries should be assessed according to victims age, vulnerability and health
R v Bollom (2004)
States that you can direct the jury to serious harm' without the using the word really.
Saunders (1985)
Stated that GBH is said to be 'really serious harm
R v Smith(1961)
Wound defined and act?
JJC V Eisenhower (1984)a cut or break in the continuity of the skin, causing external bleeding
Wounding or GBH may be lawful when
Self defence, defence of another ,prevention of a crime, where V has consented and injury from properly conducted games.
AR of S20 GBH
•unlawfully wounded the victim or inflicted grievous bodily harm.
S20 GBH max sentence
5 years
S20 OAPA definition
"Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously wound or inflict any grievous bodily harm on any other person, either with or without a weapon or instrument, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor".