The scientific method allows us to figure out the answer instead of stating what we want the answer to be and then disregarding data that doesn't support it.
Humans are terrible at thinking and acting in their future interests, which is why it's understandable that people have trouble understanding climate change.
Senator James Inhofe from Oklahoma brought a snowball onto the floor of the Senate to give a speech about how the fact that he had a snowball in February proved that global warming wasn't real.
The misconception that scientists are constantly wrong can be due to the fact that they are willing to accept new data and change their mind if the data support it.
When considering a news article, it's important to consider the source, check the authors, look at the date of publication, review your own biases, and ask if it's a joke.
The Egyptian pharaohs are an example of delivering fake news, with a big battle resulting in a standoff that was presented as a win for the people at home.
It's important to read beyond the headline, as the headline is designed to grab your attention and pull you in, while the story itself is what provides the actual information.
Scientists have to publish their work in order to advance in their field, and scientific journals are peer reviewed, with competitors trying to poke holes in the work.
The media doesn't have the same checks and balances as science, and people have a tendency to only hear information that aligns with their personal views.
The public is often confused about the scientific consensus on climate change, with 45% thinking there's scientific agreement but 55% thinking the science is not in agreement or they don't know.