What did this policy introduce and what does it determine?
The Tripartite system, meaning that all children sat a test at age 11 (11+) to determine which school they attend for ages 11-15
What is meant by grammar schools?
Pupils who passed the 11+ went to grammar school (about 20% of the population) Pupils sat O level qualifications
What is meant by secondary modern schools?
3/4 of pupils went to secondary modern schools. The majority of pupils were not entered for formal exams before going to work at 15
What is meant by technical schools?
These schools teach practical skills. There werent many around
What did it give the opportunity of to all students - Strength
Everyone got the opportunity to have an education up to the age of 15. It gave children from deprived backgrounds the chance of a first class education and upward mobility by entering a profession
How does this policy give equality of opportunity? - Strength
Everyone sat the 11+ and different ability students would get the support and relevant resources they needed
Who did this act favour? - weakness
It favoured the rich and MC.
2/3 of those who went to grammar schools were from the MC.
80% of pupils felt like a failure at age 11
What did Halsey suggest ? - weakness
That children were divided from their different backgrounds as the Tripartite system created a two tier education system. For example, 2/3 of boys from MC families went to grammar schools whereas only 1/4 of WC boys went
What is a summary of this policy?
It created the Tripartite system therefore giving all children access to education until they are 15 years old.
It created the 11+ exam determining what school a child would go to: Grammar, Secondary modern or technical.
However it favoured the MC and the Tripartite system created a two tier education system