state the procedure behind VI and K's meta analysis
2000 strange situations
from 32 studies of attachment behaviours
8 different countries
wanted to identify intercultural and intracultural differences between attachment types
what were the findings of VI and K's study?
intracultural differences 1.5 x higher than inter-cultural differences
secure attachment was most common in all countries
insecure resistant was more common than avoidant in Israel and Japan
concluded that secure attachment was most common type across cultures- it's innate
Japan and Israel classified as collectivist, so types of attachment probably more likely to be seen as resistant because collectivist culture is different to individualistic
strongest attachments still formed with mother
cultural variations in attachment types
describe other cultural studies of attachment
GROSSMAN AND GROSSMAN- higher levels of insecure attachment amongst German infants than in other cultures. Could be due to the different childbearing practises as German mothers keep interpersonal distance from infants, so infants don't engage in proximity-seeking behaviours in the SS
TAKAHASHI- 60 middle class Japanese infants- showed no rates of avoidant but high of resistant (32%), so distressed at separation that for 90% of infants the study had to be stopped. Could be because in Japan kids rarely experience separation from their mothers
evaluation of cultural variations in attachment?
☹️global cultural influence- VI and K concluded that some cultural differences explained by mass media, so cultural similarities across cultures may not be innate biological influences but global culture
☹️cross-cultural research- strange situation is an American measurement of attachment, in Japanese culture, dependence not independence = strength. Cultural bias
😊support using other studies (Takahashi and Grossmann and Grosmann)
😊supports monotropy- secure attachment is most common as it's innate and the norm
😊strange situation high reliability- 0.94 inter-rater reliability