Reliability of Measurement: are the scores consistent?
Validity of Measurement: does it measure what it is supposed to measure
3 Types of Measures:
Self-Report (Other-Report) Measure
Observational Measure
Physiological Measure
Categorical Measures considers something grouped into categories
Quantitative Measures have meaningful numbers
Types of Quantitative Scales:
Ordinal Scale: rank order
Interval Scale: equal distances; no true zero
Ratio Scale: equal distances; true zero
Ordering matters and is meaningful for ordinal scales
There are 3 Types of Reliability:
Test-Restest Reliability: is it the same when I give it to you again
Interrater Reliability: applies to judgment on scores
Internal Reliability: applies to measures with multiple items and if they agree with each other
Correlation Coefficient (r) measures the strength of relationship between two variables
r measures reliability
Test-Retest Reliability: uses r where r>.5 (Only relevant to measure things that do not change)
Interrater Reliability: may use r or other measures where r>.7
Internal Reliability: may use r
Alpha summarizes r values in one number
TemporalInterval is the time between measurements
Types of Construct Validity
Face and Content Validity: is it a good measure
Criterion Validity: does it correlate with key behaviors
Convergent and Discriminant Validity: does the pattern make sense
Convergent Validity refers to how closely a test is related to others with similar constructs
DiscriminantValidity has less strong relations between two measures
Question Types for Surveys/Polls
open-ended
forced-choice
Likertscale
semantic differentialformat
Poorly Worded Questions:
leading question: pushing people to answer in a particular way
double-barreled question: asking two questions at once
negatively worded questions: makes people confused/thrown off
Surveys/Self-Reports are good for:
Demographics and Sample Descriptions
Subjective Experiences
The method, structure, and wording of surveys matter
Shortcuts People Take on Surveys:
ResponseSets (patterns of response)
Acquiescence (yea-saying)
Fence-Sitting (middle option)
To prevent fence-sitting, pick an even number of responses
Faking Good is the sociallydesirable way of responding
Faking Bad is a way of malingering
A comparison group enables us to compare what would happen both with and without the thing we are interested in
Confounds are alternative explanations
A confederate is an actor playing a specific role for the experimenter
Probabilistic means findings do not explain cases all the time
5 Examples of Biased Reasoning:
being swayed by a good story
being persuaded by what comes easily to mind
failing to think about what we cannot see
focusing on evidence we like best
biased about being biased
Availability Heuristics are things that pop up easily in our mind and tend to guide our thinking
Present/Present Bias reflects our failure to consider appropriate comparison groups
Confirmation Bias is the tendency to look only for information that agrees with our believe
A bias blind spot is where we are unlikely to fall prey to other biases
Empirical Journal Articles report the results of an empirical research study which contains details about the study's method, statistical tests used, and study results
Review Journal Articles summarize and integrate all the published studies that have been done in one research area
Meta-Analysis combines the results of many studies and gives a number that summarizes the magnitude or effect size of a relationship
Abstract: a concise summary of the article that briefly describes the study's hypotheses, method, and major results
Introduction: the first section of regular text that explains the topic of study
Method: explains in detail how researchers construct their study
Results: describes the quantitative end or results of the study including statistical tests used which provide tables and figures that summarize key results
Discussion: summarizes the study's research question and methods indicates how well the results of the study supported the hypotheses and includes the importance of the study