Russia

Cards (382)

  • Collectivization was the reorganization of agricultural production on the basis of collective ownership of land, labor, and farm equipment.
  • The third five-year plan (1938–42) was interrupted by World War II but included plans for increased production of consumer goods.
  • The second five-year plan (1933–37) focused on heavy industry such as coal mining, iron ore extraction, and oil refining.
  • The first five-year plan (1928–32) aimed to industrialize the Soviet Union by increasing steel output from 4 million tons to 15 million tons per year.
  • Crimean War: 1853-55
    Russia in conflict with Turkey - influence in Balkan access to Mediterranean + crusading desire for Istanbul
    Humiliated when British + France supported Turkish and superior British navy and army land small professional army in Crimea (Western forces are stronger/longer range)
    Huge Russian army is poorly trained (generals are based on nepotism) malnourished serfs, who are conscripted, hampered by lack of transport links (British parked battalions of professional ships on the Crimea)
    Nicholas I dead in 1855 - Alexander II - need negotiate disastrous peace deal to end war
  • Foreign policy pre 1855
    Russia views itself as the victor over Napoleon due to war of 1812 but it is actually isolated and seen as backward by Europe
    Nicholas isolaated Russia from the revolutions of 1848, due to the censorship of the Government
  • 50-50 rule

    Half of Russia is Russian, other half isn’t
    Russian cultural and language domination is enforced by imperialism
  • Economy pre 1855
    Russian economy is based on subsistence agriculture - lack of motivation for more, harsh conditions
    No entrepreneurial middle class or industrial basis - no real internal market
    Serfdom holds the economy - 90% are peasants and 45% are serfs, who are tied to the land and controlled by the nobility
    Land owning elite are not financially well off because their only income is the serfs and peasants
  • Religion pre 1855
    State power of Eastern Orthodox Russian Church
    Tsar is head of Church
    Church owns 25% of land
    God given power through the Tsar - Tsar was often called the “Little Father” (“Big Father” was God)
  • Censorship pre 1855
    Government controls all material published in the Empire and suppress foreign books, liberals ideas and non-Russia nationalism
    Writer named Chaadayev caused a huge scandal in 1836 - attacked autocracy, orthodoxy and Nicholas, banned but it was still read
    The Third Department - set up after 1825 Decemberist Revolt, a secret police that monitors population for opposition, death penalty can be given to “political terrorists”
  • Reforms of Alexander II - Government
    Motive:
    • Increase invest - country politically stable?
    • If someone invest Rus, fair trial
    Method:
    • Create Zemstvo for local gov by indirect election - Z make local state job appointments
    • Loris Melikov constitution - advisory national elected chamber
    Success:
    • Z popular
    • Mid class in local develop
    • Liberal happy - get constitution?
    Failure:
    • Little power
    • No further democratic reform
    • Lack tax raising ability
    • Conservative unhappy
    • No represent peasantry (electoral college)
    Legacy:
    • Alexander III no abolish - create Land Governors - rule over top
  • 1856
    Alexander II tells nobles he won’t abolish serfdom
    Inheritance that nobles had would be taken away
    Prestige took away as well as their income
    Lose political power as well
    Nobles don’t want this to happen
    He said that he needs to get rid of it at some point but that he won’t yet
    The peasants will have a revolt if they don’t get rid of it
    By later 1856 his wife and brother forced him to move on, the bureaucracy supported Alexander. Liberalism was now in fashion as it was believed this would please the Tsar. Liberalism began to flourish in the literate classes of St Petersburg
  • 1857
    After his official coronation in 1857 Alexander II set up a Secret Committee on Peasant reform led by favourite of Nicholas, Count Rostovtsev. The committee argued fiercely on compensation for the serfs. Nobles wanted to keep all their land and claimed that they would be victims of peasant vengeance the moment emancipation occurred.
  • 1861
    Alexander abolishes serfdom
    Does it by signing a decree
    No civil war
    Forces his nobles to follow it
    Not scared of losing nobility support
  • Emancipation background
    Took 6 years to reform
    Not rushed
    • Afraid that the nobles might turn on him
    • Many nobles are friends with the tsar
    • If the nobles undermine autocracy, they undermine themselves
    • Nobles are chosen by the tsar
    Alexander was someone who is nervous about taking a clear path
    • Worries about taking big decisions
    • Comes up with an idea, and then gets talked down by his advisors
    • Could be a way to blame his advisors if it’s wrong
    • Vacillating
  • Political reason for emancipation
    Peasants are threatening to have a revolution
    Middle class didn’t want to revolt
    • Middle class have something to lose
    Peasants don’t know who to revolt against
    Students led the revolution
    Either thinks that there will be a revolution or that he wants to scare the nobility into wanting to abolish serfdom
    They’ll believe it because he’s tsar
  • Political reason for emancipation for
    Between 1840 and 1844 there had been fewer than 30 outbrakes of disorder pa on privately owned estates, but more than doubled over the next 15 years
    Partly because
    • Landowners pushing peasants to produce more or pay higher rents in order to maintain their own incomes
    • Protests against military conscriptions during the Crimean War
    • Disturbances subside once the war ended in 1857
    • Traditional for the tsar to announce the freedom of serfs conscripted to fight at the end of a war
    • Alexander II’s delay (while he considered the future) increased tensions
  • Political reason for emancipation against
    Issue with peasantry
    • Culturally live in local villages – very religious
    • Would see tsar as head of church - quite conservative
    • Very loyal to tsar
    • Don’t travel
    • No communication to other peasants
    • Uprisings aren’t linked to eachother
    • Could be economic issues + protests to free veterans from serfdom
    If they change it, might start to question rulership of Russia
    • No control of serfs
    • Could cause chaos
    Nobility upset
    • Coup against tsar
    • Not likely because officers lost their power
    • Political unrest
    • Undermining concept of autocracy - they support
  • Economic reason for Emancipation
    End serfdom and give peasants individual land
    Peasants have incentive to produce + entrepreneurial agriculture
    • Become successful and use projects to expand = buy more land
    • Kulaks
    • Middle class peasants
    • They don’t end up getting this
    • Some peasants move to cities
    • Produces an urban workforce for factories
  • Entrepreneurial agriculture plan
    Give land
    Peasant incentive to produce
    Become successful + use projects to expand = buy more land
    Kulaks
    Some peasants move to cities
    • Produces urban workforce for factory
    Grain surplus
    • Don’t get this, but still export
    • No food for people
    Export grain
    Increase state revenue from tax
    • State led investment + industry
    • Government lead urbanisation
    • State
    • Government
    • Not private
    • Government revenue up
    • No organic middle class
    • Created one
    • Get less than they want but still a bit
    • Go into debt for improvement
    • Borrow money
    • Foreign investment
  • Grain surplus
    Making more grain than they need
  • Social reason for emancipation
    The creation of a middle class of kulaks would strengthen Russia and those not needed in the countryside could move to work in the new industries being created in the cities of the Empire. Nobles freed from living off the poor profits of serf estates may apply themselves as entrepreneurs or invest in middle class businesses. 
  • Military reason for emancipation
    Just lost Crimean war
    Made up largely conscripted serfs
    Military returns – more professional army
    All classes allowed for conscription
    • 15 years of service
    • Used to be 25 years
    • Most of the time – serf
    • Could be taken into wars or taken into training once a year
    • Serfs aren’t doing too well
    • Malnourished
    • Uneducated
    • No proper training
    • Any age
    • Reduce number of years of conscription
    • Training men then put back into serfdom, where unhappy + likely to rebel
    Get rid of serfdom so people no potential of revolting
  • Moral reason for emancipation
    No wage
    Work conditions are bad
    • Beating to keep order
    • A lot of exploitation of young peasant girls
    Bad health conditions
    Only country in Europe to do it
    • They all think it’s backwards
    Alexander had liberal tutors
    Miligatin brothers
    Given more liberal education so knows what other people think about serfdom
    Also appointed liberal advisors
    Appointed people who were in favour of getting rid of serfdom
    Could be that he needs other people to persuade him
  • Emancipation successes
    Was greatest transfer of land in European history
    • 45% of the population were serfs and then he got rid of it
    Nobility thought that it was going to be a disaster
    • But there was a very muted response
    • Some disturbances but mostly okay
    • In comparison to USA
    • Civil war in USA
    Carried out in a few years - quick
    Allows for urbanisation + modernisation to increase
  • Emancipation act
    Privately owned serfs were freed immediately with state owned serfs to follow in 1866. They were given land to accompany their freedom. 
    Volosts were established to allow peasants some political control over their communities.
    There was widespread joy on the announcement of the decree.
  • Emancipation failures
    647 riots in the months after
    • Bezdna saw 70 peasants killed
    • Grievances wold damage loyalty to government
    • Government had to use military force
    Landlords were unhappy
    Economic motives of emancipation was largely not met
    • Mir system kept
    The desire to limit noble anger and restrict peasant freedom after emancipation undermined the attempt to create a class of kulaks
    • Redemption payments
    • Landlords got first pick of land
    Nobility angry at loss of prestige and political power
  • Electoral college
    Weighted voting system
    Middle person between voter and result
    Was the middle class
  • Zemstvo
    Elected local government to run education, road building, health care, prisons and other works
  • Alexander II judicial reforms
    Made juries
    • Western thing
    • Emancipation created million of private land owners and the gov needed a system to resolve disputes without vigilantism taking place
    Meant that they would have more political stability
    • More investment
    • No worry about corruption
    Filled in the gaps that emancipation left
    Peasants would be in court a lot
    • Peasants would not know who’s land is who’s
    Trial by jury for political terrorism was ended after Vera Zasulich in 1877
  • Vera Zasulich
    However in the 1870s concerns were raised about the sympathy of juries towards political criminals. In 1877 Vera Zasulich shot the governor of St Petersburg in revenge for the treatment of political prisoners at the Peter and Paul Fortress. She admitted and justified her actions and was then cleared by a jury and smuggled abroad by her radical supporters. The government was furious and trial by jury for political terrorism was ended.
  • Alex II reform - education/censorship
    Liberalisation
    Need basic education to machine
    • Key to industrialisation
    Kulak likely happy if educated
    Educated population bad
    • Realise wrong
    1862-1867
    • Alexander Golovin
    • Staff choose teach/read
    • Orthodox Church no responsible primary + secondary
    • Zemstva
    • Improve population literacy
    • Pupil primary education
    • 400,000 - 1mill
    • Tripling uni student
    • 10,000 after
    • Major rollback censorship
    • Publishing increase tenfold
    • Gold age Russian literature
    • 1866
    • Dimitri Tolstoy try shoot Alex
    • More censorship, university restricted
  • Alexander II reform - military
    Reduced from 25 years to 15 with 9 in reserve
    Needed new colleges to make more professional
    • Not nepotism, but rather because they were professional
    Gets extended to everybody
    • Not just peasants
    1878
    • Russian army was able to successfully defeat the Turkish army in 1878
    • Still high casualties and not win advantageous peace at Berlin conference
    • Alexander III
    • No wars
    • Nicholas II
    • 2 wars
    Nobles and middle class would pay others to take their conscription duties
  • Conservative opposition to Alex II
    Not really an opposition group
    • But they oppose the reforms
    Nobles won’t get rid of the tsar
    • Catherine the Great
    • It’s happened before
    If autocracy goes, the nobility probably goes, so they probably won’t do anything
    Also Alexander’s 2nd son was a conservative so they wouldn’t have to wait too long for conservatism
    Retrogrades
    • Conservative
    • Nobility
    • Appeal to nationalism in the lower classes
    Salvophiles
    • Russia is very good in their eyes
  • Liberal opposition to Alex II
    Happy reform, but no constitution
    • But reforms are happening
    Elite middle class
    • Elite nobility + professional middle class
    • Not mass population
    • Students, teachers, lawyers etc.
    Count Tolstoy in charge
    • Retrograde
    • Ban books
    Liberals mad after Count Tolstoy
    • Don’t tend to revolution
    • Have something to lose
    • Jobs
    • Want reform, not break
    • Complain + put pressure
    • Disgruntled/frustrated liberals
    • Have Zemstva
    • Elected + complain
    • Probably not critical about tsar
    • People around him
    No danger to Alex
    • No political power
    • Small part population
    • Not radical
  • Marxism
    Inevitability of communism
    • Hate capitalism, but great advance
    Simplifies class system
    • Nobility
    • Not relevant
    • Bourgeoise
    • Owners means of production
    • Industrial work force
    • Proletariat
    Capitalism based on exploitation
    • When “class consciousness” occurs, revolution
    • Feel powerless
    • But revolution successful because numbers
    Capitalism creates its own grave diggers
    • No marxism
    • No/small proletariat
    • Small nobility + small bourgeoise
    • A lot peasant
    Come away from Marxism
    • Use peasantry as revolutionary class
    • Kill tsar + heirs
    • Leads to mass revolution
  • Anarchism
    No government or authority
    Probably been since the French Revolution
    But the most powerful people take over
    • Mafia
    • Gangs
    • People who have guns
    Tends to lead to less freedom
    • No government
    No rules
    Can take whatever and whenever
  • Nihilism
    Belief in nothing
    Might lead to compete destruction
  • Communism
    Equality
    • No class system
    Each from their ability to each from their need
    Based on economic incentive
    • Do it for yourself and family
  • Radicals
    Want revolution rather than reform