Dunne and Gazeley (2008) argue that schools persistently produce working class underachivement because of the labels and assumptions as teachers.
Dunne and Gazeley conducted interviews in 9 different state secondary schools and found that teachers normalised working class underachievement they adaopted a fatalistic mindset about w/c students.
However teachers believed that they m/c pupils could overcome their underachievement
teachers label w/cparents as uninterested in their child's education but m/c parents are labelled as supportive - eg) by attending parents evenings
this led to class differences in how teachers dealt with pupils thwy percieved as underachieving by setting extension work for underachieving m/c pupils but entering w/c students into easier exams (foundation papers)
teachers underestimate w/c pupils potential and those who are doing well were seen as overachieving
Dunne and Gazeley state that the way teachers explained and dealt with underachievement constructed class differences in levels of attainment