SEP (textbook) -> the scientific study of 1) people and their behaviors in sport and exercise activities and 2) the practical application of that knowledge
by examining affect (one's feelings), behavior (one's actions), and cognitions (one's thoughts) within a dynamic and a changing environment
SEP (article) -> involves the scientific study of the psychological factors that are associated with participation and performance in sport, exercise, and other types of physicalactivity
t/f: sports, exercise, and physical activity are seen as the same in SEP.
false
Objectives of SEP:
to understand the effects of psychological factors on physical and motor performance
rational
to understand the effects of participation in physical activity on psychological development, health, and well-being
example of what objective of SEP:
how does anxiety affect a basketball player's accuracy in free-throw shooting?
1
example of what objective of SEP:
does physical therapy influence a wounded warrior's optimistic view of the future?
2
roles in SEP:
research -> inquiry aimed at advancing knowledge and sharing it through professional meetings and journal articles
teaching -> teaching university courses in psychology or exercise and sport science
consulting -> working with athletes of all ages and abilities in the fitness industry, sports medicine, and physical therapy
consulting specialties in SEP (educational side)
mentalcoach
training in physical education, kinesiology, or exercise and sport science
educate and increase athletes' and coaches' awareness of issues such as anxiety management
*working with people that don't have severe problems
3 approaches to SEP:
psychophysiological orientation
social-psychological orientation
cognitive-behavioral orientation
psychophysiological orientation:
examines underlying psychophysiological processes of the brain in terms of primary causes of behavior
ex. biofeedback to trained marksmen to manipulate physiological functions
social-psychological orientation:
behavior is determined by a complex interaction of the social environment and the personal makeup of the athlete/exerciser
ex. how a coach's style and strategies foster team cohesion
*more focused on interpersonal aspects**
cognitive-behavioral orientation:
behavior is determined by not only the environment but also thoughts
ex. studying differences in behaviors among tennis players with or without burnout
*focused more on intrapersonal aspects**
theory in SEP:
a set of interrelated facts presenting a systematic view of somee phenomenon in order to describe, explain, and predict its future occurrences
allows scientists to organize and explain large numbers of facts efficiently
SEP is more efficient when theories are used vs in regular science
studies vs experiments:
observational study -> the investigator observes or assesses without changing the environment in any way
experiment -> the investigator manipulates variables while observing them, then examines how changes in one or more variables affect changes in others
pros and cons of observational study:
(+) = more convenient
(-) = weaker in explaining causal effect
pros and cons of experiment:
(+) = better in explaining causal effect
(-) = less convenient
understanding professional practice knowledge
professional practice knowledge is what we learn through experience, using many methods of knowing:
scientific method
systematic observation
single case study
shared (public) experience
introspection
intuition
scientific method, systematic observation, & single case studies are more reliable and useful
reinforcement and feedback are related but not interchangeable
reinforcement -> the use of rewards and punishment, which increase or decrease the likelihood of a similar response occurring in the future
feedback -> the info learners receive about their actions and performance
why principles of reinforcement are complex:
people react differently to the same reinforcement
people are unable to repeat desirable behaviors
people receive different reinforcers in different situations
the predominant approach should be positive when influencing behavior
*especially with the youth population
feedback has 2 dimensions:
motivational
instructional
motivational feedback influences performance by
enhancing confidence, inspiring greater effort, and creating a positive mood
providing valuable reinforcement to the performer
*not commenting on behavior/skill
instruction feedback provides info about:
specific behavior to be performed
levels of proficiency that should be achieved
the performer's current level of proficiency
*more about physical behavior/skill
providing feedback:
choose effective reinforcers
choose the timing/schedule of reinforcement
early learning = continuous and immediate feedback
learned skill = intermittent and immediate feedback
t/f: behavior modification, contingency management, behavioral coaching, program are all the same (they're interventions).
true
Mckenzie & Rushall (1974):
problem -> youth swimmers not showing up to practice
contingency management -> creation of an attendance board with checks for different types of behaviors
findings:
attendance rates increased from phase 1 to phase 3
overall performance increased by 27%
why?
reinforcement of the checkmark/"competition" w/ teammates of number of check marks
psychologicalflow: a holistic, intrinsically motivating sensation that people feel when they are totally involved in an activity or are on automatic pilot
attending to a task to the point where you can't hear/notice anything other than activity
balance of challenge and skills (flow):
high challenge + low skills = anxiety
high challenge + high skills = flow
low challenge + low skills = apathy
low challenge + high skills = boredom
group: two or more people who interact and exert mutual influence on each other
2 subs groups:
interactive (ex. basketball)
co-active (ex. bowling)
interactive groups are more important for team dynamics and cohesion
a team is a subset of a group
4 KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF A TEAM:
collective sense of identity: "we-ness" rather than "I-ness"
distinctiveroles: all members know their job
structured modes of communication: lines of communication
norms: social rules that guide members on what to do or not
teamwork -> dynamic process involving a collaborative effort by team members to be effectively carry out the independent and interdependent behaviors that are required to maximize a team's likelihood of achieving its purposes
theories of group development:
linear perspective
life cycle perspective
pendular perspective
LINEAR PERSPECTIVE STAGES:
forming -> familiarization, formation of interpersonal relationships, development of team structure
storming -> rebellion, resistance to the leader and to control by the group, interpersonal conflict
norming -> development of solidarity and cooperation, group conflicts resolved
performing -> putting energies for team success
Linear perspective = simpliest
life cycle perspective = more complex than linear
pendular perspective = mostcomplex
LIFE CYCLE PERSPECTIVE:
development of groups is similar to the life cycle - birth, growth, death
this model is especially relevant for groups and teams that last 10 to 15 weeks
ex. summer tennis team
PENDULAR PERSPECTIVE:
groups don't progress through stages in a linear fashion