key question - EWT

Cards (18)

  • what is the key question
    should eyewitness testimony (EWT) be trusted by the criminal justice system?
  • what does EWT refer to
    the information given by a witness who sees a crime occur
  • do juries tend to trust EWT
    yes
  • why could juries trusting EWT be a bad thing sometimes
    there are cases where EWT has been inaccurate and has so lead to miscarriages of justice
  • who showed that EWT can be unreliable
    Loftus and palmer
  • what was the aim of L+Ps experiment
    to test if language used in EWT can alter memory, aimed to show that leading questions could distort accounts and have confabulating effects
  • what was the experiement
    ppts shown films of traffic accidents, asked to recall them
    . then asked specific questions using different verbs for different ppts eg how fast were the cars going when they bumped/smashed/hit each other
  • what were the findings
    the responses to the questions were affected by the verb used in the question - showed that memory of events is highly flexible and can be modified/changed/supplemented when other information is heard
  • conclusion of experiment on EWT
    can be biased by the way questions are asked
  • strengths of experiment
    high control of confounding variables = high validity
  • what can we get statistics from
    the innocence project
  • how many wrongful convictions were there in this sample
    232
  • what percent of those involved eyewitness misidentification
    63%
  • what percent of those convictions involved EWT alone
    33%
  • what case can show the flaws of EWT
    ronald cottons case
  • what happened in Ronald cottons case
    . was convicted of rape and given a life sentence
    . 10 years later DNA proved he was innocent
    . h had been convicted with evidence heavily relying on eyewitness identification from the people he allegedly assulted
    . their accounts were wrong/they misidentified him leading to the miscarriage of justice
  • answer to the key question
    . is a necessary means of hearing evidence from many people to see many sides of evidence of a story
    . however should not be used as evidence alone to avoid miscarriages of justice
  • how can this affect society
    . induce fear as criminals may be free as not been convicted
    . hard for families and individuals involved in convictions that are wrong - spend time in prison for no reason - emotionally distressing for all