The principal tasks of philosophy of science are to analyze methods of inquiry used in science, question assumptions that scientists take for granted, and assess the justification of scientific knowledge.
In a scientific experimentation, scientists may take for granted some results that can be different, so philosophical science focuses on why assume that things will be the same.
Caloric and Kinetic theories are competing to explain the same phenomenon, the likelihood of each being true is not assessed on the basis of how theoretical each is.
Axioms are statements which are regarded as being established, accepted or self-evidently true, they do not need to be proven, they are taken for granted.
Logical consequence or entailment is a relationship between a set of premises and a conclusion, when the conclusion follows from the premises, it expresses a relation instead of axioms and theorems are statements.
In the Aristotelian science, relationships between explanation and justification are symmetrical, they change depending on the kind of science being dealt with.
Hypothetical laws are not tested and are not well established, while law-like theories are both generalizations about natural kinds and support predictions.
Science aims to describe the world and explain phenomena, and to understand the compositions and to identify the underlying and unobservable causes of observable phenomena.
In the Aristotelian model, the knowledge that we get is evident and can’t be rejected because we start from axioms, resulting in a symmetrical relation.
The language of empirical theories is composed by the observative lexicon (entities that can be ascertained by observation, everything that can be seen with eyes) and the theoretical lexicon (not observable entities, cognition).