Aftermath of Stalin's death it was inclear to the West who was in charge of Soviet foreign policy
Within Soviet Politburo (Main gov group in a communist country, which makes all important decisions)
Soviet Politburo, Laventii Beria, long - serving head of the secret police
Offered the west a proposal for a reunified, neutral Germany
Collective leadership - Beria
Death of Stalin in 1953, left associates of politburo
Provided opportunity for his successors to try a different approach to dealing with the West
Collective leadership - Beria
His motives may of been to distance himself from Stalin's policies or to merely impress his colleagues in his politburo
Failed. Beria's association with the less pleasant aspects of Stalin's policies was too much for the other members of politburo and he got arrested within months
Collective leadership - Beria
Accused of being a British agent, he was later executed
An opportunity to end the divsion of Germany and therefore lost
1955 May - Austrian state treaty; Federal Republic of Germany is admitted to NATO
1955 July - Geneva summit
1955 Feb - Khrushchev's Secret speech is delivered
1956 June - Oct - Polish uprising
1956 Oct - Nov - Hungarian uprising
1959 Sept - Khrushchev and Camp David talks
1960 May - Paris summit
1960 June - Kennedy and Khrushchev meet in Vienna
Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev (1894 - 1971) = Denounced Stalin's crimes in 1956, having previously been a Stalinisr hard liner
Appeared to swing between an attitude of cooperation and one of aggression
Decision to place nuclear missiles on Cuba in 1962
Malenkov's 'New Course'
Removal of Beria, Soviet foreign policy fell into the control of Georgi Malenkov who, with Khrushchev and Bulganin, formed a collective leadership
Malenkov was able and intelligent. Recognised limitations of hard line approach of confrontation towards the West
Malenkov's 'New Course'
Decided to embark on 'New Course'
Believed war between capitalism and communism was no longer inevitable
Therefore resources could be directed away from arms and heavy industry and towards consumer goods and raising living standards in the USSR
Malenkov's 'New Course'
Malenkov's 'New Course'was criticised by Khrushchev during his struggle for power
Yet after Malenkov was removed from position of prime minister in 1955
Khrushchev was to adopt and develop the 'New Course'
Peaceful coexistence
Policy put forward by Khrushchev in late 1950s
Capitalism and communism should accept the existence of the other
Rather than use force to destroy each other
Believed capitalism would collapse eventually due to its own Weaknesses
Danger of nuclear devastation was not worth the risk
Khrushchev and Peaceful coexistence
Building on the 'New course', Khrushchev articulated a new approach towards the west which became known as peaceful coexistence
Malenkov had used the term in 1952 but under Khrushchev it was a fully formed policy
Khrushchev and peaceful coexistence
Khrushchev accepted the Marxist belief that the downfall of capitalism was inevitable
The class struggle would continue, but by different means
With nucleare war too dangerous, the two systems would have to accept the existence of each other in short term
Khrushchev and peaceful coexistence
Khrushchev developed this between 1955 and 1957
Established firmly as leader of the Soviet Union in June 1957
Rise in Khrushchev
Khrushchev became the dominant personality
Son of a peasant farmer, worked as a farm labourer and a machine in a coaline before going to technical college
The joining the communist party
Rise in Khrushchev
Malenkov resigned in 1955 after disagreeing with Khrushchev about industrial policies
Khrushchev's position further strengthened by a speech delivered at the 20th communist party congress 1956 strongly criticizing various aspects of Stalin's policies
Rise in Khrushchev
Speech where he strongly criticises Stalin's policies:
Condemned Stalin for encouraging the cult of his own personality instead of allowing the party to rule
Details about Stalin'spurges in the 1930s and criticised his conduct of the war
Claimed that socialisation could be achieved in ways other than those insisted on by Stalin
Peaceful coexistence could be achieved in ways other than those insisted on by Stalin
Rise in Khrushchev
Not quite supreme yet
Molotov and Malenkov believed his speech was too drastic and would encourage unrest
Tried to focus him out of office
As party secretary, Khrushchev like Stalin quietly filling key positions with his own supporters
Compulsory retired (June 1957)
Khrushchev was fully responsible for all Russian policy until 1964
Rise in Khrushchev
Mainly responsible for the introduction of some new, more radical policies
End of Stalin's system of terror
Attempt to develop better relations with non - communist states - co existence instead of conflict
Rise in Khrushchev
Mainly responsible for the introduction of some new, more radical policies:
Attempt to strengthen the Soviet economy by de - centralising and streamlining agriculture, industry and bureaucracy in order to improve the standard of living of the Soviet people
His seven year plan introduced in 1959 one of his most ambitious innovations
Thaw in the cultural life of the USSR
Rise in Khrushchev
Pursued all these policies with determination and enthusiasm and achieved some successes
Industrial parts of the seven year plan
Some of his policies were unsuccessful. His agricultural reforms were disappointing, while his more relaxed attitude towards the Soviet satelite states caused
Problems in Poland and Hungary where in 1956 there was a popular uprising against the communist government
Rise in Khrushchev
Thaw in Soviet relations with the West, the USSR came to brink of nuclear war with the USA in 1962 over the Cuban Missile crisis
Bitter rift developed between the USSR was the world's other major communist state, China
Khrushchev's colleague drop him as a leader in October 1964 and he was forced to retire into private life
Khrushchev's clear foreign policy imperatives:
Soviet Union remain unchallenged leaders of the socialist community and both within Eastern Europe
in face of growing competition with China and its leader Mao Zedong
Firm grip must be maintained over Eastern Bloc satelite states
Khrushchev's clear foreign policy imperatives:
Germany prevented from rearming and becoming a future threat to the Soviet Union
USSR must continue to expand its nuclear capability and stay firmly implanted in the nuclear arms race between East and West
Spending on military security including Soviet conventional forces in Eastern Europe has to be reduced
International tension has to be defused and care taken to not unnecessarily provoke the USA
Khrushchev's clear foreign policy imperatives:
International tensions has to be defused and care taken to not unnescessarily provoke the USA
Final point underpins the aims of the Soviet Union under Khrushchev. Post - Stalinist Soviet leadership proposed to meet and counter the growing power of the USA through a policy of peaceful coexistence
Khrushchev's clear foreign policy imperatives:
Stalinist aggression had led to an escalation of expenses and government debt at a time when Khrushchev wanted to concentrate Soviet resources on domestic developments
Genuine desire for the export of revolution
Understood better then Americans counterparts, the potential risks of nuclear war
Khrushchev's clear foreign policy imperatives:
Adopted peaceful coexistence
Involved engaging the USA in diplomacy to diffuse tensions where possible
Prevent direct confrontations
Cooperation was seen intially over the future of Austria
Poland: June - October 1956
Upon the unexpected death of in 1956 of Boleslaw Beirut, Polish communist leader
Khrushchev nominated his successor, Edward Ochab to implement de Stalinisation in Poland
After the secret speech many Poles started to demand more political freedom and national sovereignty
28th June 1956, workers went on strike and in protest at wage cuts and poor working conditions
Poland: June - October 1956
October 1956 discretied Wladyslaw Gomulka was elected as first secretary of the Polish United Workers' party
(the Polish Communist Party)
Khrushchev met with Gomulka and threatened military intervention if Gomulka refused to cooperate
Gomulka could be appointed First secretary if he agreed not to carry out reforms that might threaten local communist rule or the unity of the Soviet Bloc
Poland: June - October 1956
Poland would remain a member of the Warsaw Pact
Soviet troops were already stationed in Poland and were available to move in Warsaw however they were not needed
Force was not used because support shown from Beijing towards the Polish Communist Party
Poland: June - October 1956 - Impacts
Many poles suspected Gomulka because (in their opinion) he had a preserved a Polish path to socialism rather than conforming to Soviet views
How their satelite states should behave
Gomulka skilfully balanced the need for Polish security with the presence of Soviet troops in Poland
In order to place Moscow, USSR would protect Poland from any revenge from West Germany
Poland: June - October 1956 - Impacts
Polish uprising showed that Moscow would allow its satelites a reasure of national independence if the regimes were led by trustworthy men
Khrushchev's instinct had been to use force once Gomulka, a nationalist leader had taken control of their Polish Communist party
Force was not used because China supported the Polish Communist party
Wasn't apart of the increasing role being played in international communism by China
Hungary: October - November 1956
22 October, students in Budapest demonstrated and listed 16 demands
Included the appointment of Imre Nagy as Prime Minister, withdrawal of Soviet troops from Hungary, freedom of speech and a free press
multi party elections
Next day escalated an armed revolt as the demonstrations were fired on by the Hungarian Secret police
Hungary: October - November 1956
Events moved quickly as workers' groups joined the students and seized power from communist local authorities
24thOctober, Nagy was appointed PrimeMinister, put with a Sovietdelegation, led by AnastasMikoyan in order to convince the USSR that militaryintervention was not necessary