Statistics

Cards (37)

  • What is selection bias?
    when there are systematic differences between comparison groups
  • Type 2 error
    The failure to reject the null hypothesis when it is false.
  • Phase 2 trial
    Testing of drug on large group of patients to assess efficacy and safety
  • How does randomisation of subjects make a randomised controlled trial more rigorous?
    reduces the risk of selection bias
  • List the components of the ‘evidence pyramid’ going from strongest to weakest form of evidence.
    • Meta-analysis
    • Systematic Review
    • Randomized Controlled Trial
    • Cohort Studies
    • Case-control studies
    • Cross-sectional studies
    • Case reports
    • Expert Opinion
  • Risk ratio
     probability of an event occurring in an exposed group compared to the probability occurring in a non-exposed group
  • How to calculate the Number Needed to Treat?
    Number Needed to Treat is inversely proportional to the Absolute risk reduction (%)
    E.g. if ARR is 4% , then NNT is 1/4 x 100 = 25
  • NNT = 25. What does this mean?
    An average of 25 people will have to receive the intervention for 1 of them to benefit compared to someone not receiving the intervention
  • Pre-clinical trial
    Animal/cell testing to gather information about efficacy and toxicity
  • Phase 0 trial
    Sometimes not done
    small group of volunteers, used to assess pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics
  • Phase 1 trial
    Testing of drug on healthy volunteers to find appropriate dosing
  • Phase 3 trial
    Testing of drug on a large group of patients to confirm effectiveness, safety and comparing to existing interventions
  • How to calculate sensitivity?
    true positivetrue postive + false negative\frac{true\ positive}{true\ postive\ +\ false\ negative}
  • How to calculate specificity?
    true negativetrue negative + false positive\frac{true\ negative}{true\ negative\ +\ false\ positive}
  • How to calculate positive predictive value?
    true positivetrue positive + false positive\frac{true\ positive}{true\ positive\ +\ false\ positive}
  • How to calculate negative predictive value?
    true negativetrue negative + false negative\frac{true\ negative}{true\ negative\ +\ false\ negative}
  • How to calculate false positive rate?
    1 - specificity
  • How to calculate false negative rate?
    1 - sensitivity
  • Rate ratio
    Also known as incidence ratio
    Measure of association which compares the incidence rate in an exposed group to the incidence rate in a non-exposed group
  • Confidence interval
    Range within which the true treatment effect is likely to lie
  • Selection bias
    When there are systematic differences between comparison groups
  • Which studies commonly use the odds ratio as a measure of association?
    Case-control studies
    May also be used in cross-sectional studies
  • What is the main disadvantage of cross-sectional studies?
    Do not show causality or account for confounding factors which may influence data
    So, associations may be difficult to interpret
  • Attributable risk
    Measure of association
    Amount of proportion of disease incidence (disease risk) that can be attributed to the exposure
  • Cross-sectional study
    Collection of data from a population in a specific time point
  • Type 1 error
    Incorrect rejection of the null hypothesis when it is true
  • Calculating relative risk
    risk of poor outcomes in intervention grouprisk of poor outcomes in the control group\frac{risk\ of\ poor\ outcomes\ in\ intervention\ group}{risk\ of\ poor\ outcomes\ in\ the\ control\ group}
  • Measurement bias
    Error due to data collection during measurement
    Can occur in both qualitative & quantitative studies
  • Odds ratio calculation
    ADBC\frac{AD}{BC}
  • Interventional studies
    Participants receive 1 or more intervention or treatment
    Types
    • randomised control trial
    • pre-post study
  • Observational studies
    Participants are observed without an intervention
    Types
    • cohort
    • case-control
  • What is the Bradford-Hill Criteria?
    9 viewpoints to help determine if observed epidemiological associations are casual
    • strength -> strong associations
    • consistency -> repeated observation of an association in different populations under different circumstances
    • specificity -> cause leads to a single effect (not multiple)
    • temporality -> cause precede the effect in time
    • biologic gradient -> unidirectional dose responsive curve
    • plausibility -> biologic plausibility of hypothesis
    • coherence -> interpretation does not conflict with known natural history & biology
    • experimental evidence
    • analogy
  • Odds ratio
    Probability that an event will occur given an exposure, compared to the probability that that event will occur absent the exposure
    Used in case-control studies, may be used in cross-sectional studies
  • Interpretation of odd ratio
    OR = 1
    • exposure will not affect outcome
    OR < 1
    • exposure is associated with lower probability of outcome
    OR > 1
    • exposure is associated with higher probability of outcome
  • Absolute risk reduction (AAR)
    Absolute difference in risk between control group & experimental group
    ARR = Risk(control group) - Risk(experimental group)
  • Relative risk reduction (RRR)
    Proportional reduction in risk bestowed by the intervention compared to the control situation
    RRR = 1 - (Risk(experimental group) / Risk(control group)
  • Selection bias
    Selection of individuals, groups or data for analysis in such a way that proper randomization is not achieved, thereby ensuring that the sample obtained is not representative of the population intended to be analysed
    Types
    • sampling
    • time interval
    • susceptibility
    • attrition