Alpha Bias = exaggerates/overestimates differences between sexes; more likely to devalue females in relation to males
Beta Bias = underestimates or ignores gender differences, assumes that men and women are the same; aim is to produce theories that can claim universality
Androcentrism = Males are taken as the norm from which theory and research is developed which can lead to female behaviour being misunderstood/pathologised; results in alpha/beta bias
Topics for Alpha Bias
Biological basis for gender differences
Sociobiological theory of relationship formation
Biological basis for gender differences (Alpha Bias)
Ingalhalikar et al; MRI scans
Showed women had better connections between left & right sides of the brain
Showed men had more intense activity within individual parts (eg cerebellum = motor activity)
Suggests F = multi-tasking; M = single complex tasks
Sociobiological theory of relationship formation (Alpha Bias)
Survival efficiency = explains human sexual attraction
Males = impregnate as many women possible = increase chance of preserving genes
Females = selective choosing of partner = healthy survival of fewer offspring
Sexual promiscuity seen as genetically determined in men
Topics for Beta Bias
Fight or Flight response
Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning
Topics for Androcentrism
Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS)
Fight or Flight Response (Beta Bias)
Ignores hormonal changes in women during ovulation affecting behaviour
Misrepresents female behaviour
PMS (Androcentrism)
Diagnostic category that pathologises female behaviour and emotions; leads to stereotypes
Maleanger seen as rational responses to external pressures
Evaluation = Implications of gender bias
Tarvis (1993) = androcentrism results in it becoming “normal for women to feel abnormal”
Scientific justification to discriminate and deny women equal opportunities in workforce or society
Twice as likely to be diagnosed with depression compared to men
Evaluation = Overcoming gender bias
Worhell (1992) = Women should be studied within meaningful real-life contexts
Diversity within groups of women investigated
Evaluation = Gender bias in research methodology
Nicolson (1995) = female participants find themselves in inequitable relationships with male researcher who often labels them as irrational/unable to complete tasks
Lack of women in senior levels
Less likely to have their work published
Studies with alpha bias more likely to be published