What exclusion criteria did Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg use?
They excluded any studies that looked at children with special needs (such as Down's syndrome), any study with less than 25 mother-baby pairs, and any study using children older than 2 years.
One strength of research into cultural variations in attachment is that most of the studies were conducted by indigenous psychologists. What does indigenous psychologists mean?
Indigenous psychologists are those from the same cultural background as the participants.
Why is it good to include indigenous psychologists?
Many of the potential problems in cross-cultural research can be avoided, such as misunderstandings of language or having difficulty communicating instructions. Difficulties can also include bias because of one nation's stereotypes of another.
A criticism of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg's research is that they may have been comparing countries and not, in fact, cultures. What may be a problem with any of the samples within Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg's study in relation to culture?
Within each country there are many different subcultures, each of which may have different childcare practices.
How has culture been found to affect attachment within a country?
One study of attachment in Tokyo (an urban setting) found similar distributions of attachment types to the Western studies, whereas a more rural sample found an over-representation of insecure-resistant individuals (Van IJzendoorn and Sagi, 2001)
How is using the Strange Situation in other countries an example of imposed etic?
In Britain and the USA, lack of affection on reunion may indeed indicate an avoidant attachment. But in Germany such behaviour would be more likely interpreted as independence rather than insecurity