Psychologists typically used people that were available to them in studies - people from the same culture. Historically there has been a lack of research for comparing people from different cultures.
Various cultural perspectives and differences have been ignored or underrepresented.
Reasons for Cultural Variations
Discrimination with the view of non-western cultures being ‘primitive’ or not worthy of study.
Cross-cultural research is expensive, time consuming and demands many resources. This makes it challenging to conduct.
Etic Research
When research based on one culture is generalised and applied to all culture.
Emic Research
Research based on studying a specific culture.
Etic Research Strengths
Humans from various cultures do have similarities.
Certain behaviours are also universal, e.g language development.
Etic Weaknesses
Challenging to apply principles and conclusions from one study to all culture.
Researchers may be bias due to imposed etic.
Emic Research Strengths
Avoids cultural bias and bias of imposed etic.
Not trying to generate universal laws.
Emic Weaknesses
Bias can still happen, due to the over-emphasis of differences between cultural groups and not looking at the differences within cultural groups.
Sub-culture Bias
Smaller sub-groups within larger cultural groups.
For example, when examining British culture as a whole, there could be sub-groups of male and female.
Gender Bias
Results from one gender are treated less favourably then the other.
Alpha Bias
Exaggerating the differences between men and women.
Beta Bias
Exaggerating the similarity between men and women, minimising gender differences.
Andocentrism
Taking male behaviours as normal and regarding female thinking as abnormal.
Ethnocentrism
When the culture of the psychologist is treated as the norm.
Asch’s Line Study (Ethnocentrism)
Aschs research into conformity 1951 concluded that people will conform to majority opinion.
Because only Americans were used the research is Ethnocentric.
Milgram (Ethnocentrism)
Milgrams obedience experiments 1963 used only an American sample, therefore producing results with an imposed etic.
Cochrane and Sashidharan
Found that Afro-Carribean descenders were seven times more likely to be diagnosed.
This lead people to assume they have a higher genetic predisposition for it, however, their rates are no higher then the UK’s.
Littlewood and Lipsedge (1989)
Found that Afro-Caribbean’s were more likely to be prescribed higher doses of medications