EFFECTIVENESS - research evidence to support (Antabuse)
Neiderhoffen + Staffen (03) - compareantabuse and placebo
antabuse group - longer periods of abstinence than control
use of antabuse to provideunpleasant stimulus > effective at treating serious addictions
however ATmay - more effective when usedwith other 'talking' therapies
EFFECTIVENESS - research evidence to support use of rapidsmoking
McRobbie (07) RS condition - significantdecrease in urge to smoke in 24hours and allweek after treatment than control > anti-smokingvideo
rapidsmoking = effectiveunpleasantstimuli to breaksmokingaddiction
4weekslater - nosignificantdifferences in amount of smokingbetweengroups > may only have short-termbenefits
EFFECTIVENESS - onlytreatssymptoms, notcause
negativeassociation may onlytreathowindividualfeelstowardsfocus of addiction > doesn'ttreatunderlying cause
therapy may appear to successfullycureaddiction > underlyingproblem may reoccur in form of a differentaddiction / undesirablebehaviour - symptom substitution
ETHICS - methods that createnegativeassociation = risk of harm
antabuse - negative and serioussideeffects when mixed with alcohol (e.g. convulsions and heartfailure)
rapid smoking - unpleasant, risks to health
AT - unethicalcompared to alternative treatments for addiction
risksjustified by risksposed by addiction > withoutsuccessfultreatment > addictsmorelikely to experiencerisks of harm to physical and psychologicalhealth
ETHICS - ethical costsjustified by long term benefits
breakingserious addiction > benefits > health, finances and relationships
benefitsoutweighpotentialrisks > AT - ethical approach to therapy
those using AT - givenvalid consent to takepart in therapeutic methods involved
ETHICS - moreethicalforms of negativestimuli have been developed
covertsensitisation - imaginescenarioinvolving/engaging in addictivebehaviour
- imaginescenarios that getprogressivelyworse
Kraft (05) - notonlyeffective but farmoreethical > avoidsunpleasantreactions to substances/stimuli