in real life therapy for phobias (most effective), virtual reality works too
Psychology's roots:
Philosophy:
Aristotle:sleep,memory, diversity of personality
Philosophers have studied things that are psychological
Psychology and Philosphy share same topics of study
Uses logical thinking; psychologists use logic and research
Physiology:
is the science of the functions and mechanics of living organisms
Herman Von Helmholtz
History of Psychology:
Roots in Greek Philosophy
Roots in Physiology
Herman Von Helmholtz: physiologist, studied sensory system, found the speed of neural impulse (88ft/sec)
Influences some to use same methods to measure thought
Modern psychology begins late 1800s:
Father of Psychology: Wilhelm Wundt
Established lab in 1879
Titchner
Structuralism:pieces that make up conscious mind
Father of American Psychology: William James
Functionalism: conscious mind in relation to everyday function
Sigmund Freud
Most well known
Psychoanalysis
School of thought
rigid belief of what psychologists should study and how
Wilhelm Wundt
Father of Psychology
Considered that because he founded the first psychology lab in 1879
Purposed:
that he could use introspection and exposure to stimuli to identify the elements of consciousness
Introspection: analyze own thoughts, beginning to measure the mind, stimulus exposure, and see what the subject says
Could be a sensation, memory, emotion, thoughts, ect.
Edward Titchner
Student of Wundt's
Came up with the first school of thought
Structuralism:
use introspecton to measure conscious mind
Explored the elements or pieces of thought that make up the conscious mind
William James
Father of American Psychology
Lab established in 1883
Functionalism:
how conscious mind is related to functional, or adaptive behavior
How it helps you function day to day, how is mind impacting behavior?
Wrote first psychology textbook
How is Wundt's and James' approach to psychology different
Wundt focused on introspection of consciousness
focused on elements of thought
James focused on behavior in environment
focused on how the conscious mind helps function
Sigmund Freud:
Most well known
Contributions:
talkotherapy,psychoanalysis, variation of the conscious mind, cause a revolution in psychology, listened to "hysterical" women
Criticisms:
pseudoscientific,misrepresented case studies, forced his ideas on patients, prehistoric trauma, not ethical, didn't believe in what he was doing, gay glitch, claims were not falsifiable
Psychoanalysis
school of thought, unconscious mind and unconscious thought,
societal pressures causes certain thoughts to be pushed back to unconscious mind
Falsifiable: a claim that can be tested which means that it is scientific
chocolate tastes better than pasta - not falsifiable
we live in the most violent time in history - notfalsifiable
time can run backward as well as forward - notfalsifiable
there are planets other than earth that have water - falsifiable
Psychological Perspectives
particular ways of explaining behavior and or thought
Behavioral Perspective: behavior determined by environment 1920 s
J.B. Watson (founder) and B.F. Skinner
learned behavior patterns
S -> R model
Stimulus -> Response
Something in environment -> learned behavior pattern
Ex: eat a whole bunch of popcorn -> barf
J.B. Watson: we learn to associate stimuli and respond to both in the same way
Ex: eat something -> barf -> now don't like
B.F. Skinner: we learn to associate our voluntary behaviors with rewards or punishment that follows
Ex: new experience -> good consequence -> do it more
Biological/Neuroscience: thought and behaviors are due to the physical activity in the nervous system
1950 s
Brain and spinal cord: central nervous system
Nerves elsewhere: peripheral system
Cognitive:
1960 s
Neisser, Chonsky, Piaget, Vygotsky
Cognitive <-thoughts:
how we process information determines our behavior
1960 s
Neisser, Chonsky, Piaget, Vygotsky
Stimulus -> Cognition -> Response
Input -> process -> output
Read violent lyrics -> believe from rap song -> think it is highly offensive and is concerned
Read violent lyrics -> believe from folk song -> less likely to think of it as offensive
It is thoughts, knowledge, beliefs,expectations, decision making
Cross Cultural or Sociocultural:
1980s
Thoughts and behaviors are shaped by our culture
Muller Lyer Illusion
Evolutionary:
inherit tendencies to think and believe in certain ways b/c they were adaptive and helpful in the past
Ex: taste preferences
Intraspecies competition:
within a species, there is competition for scarce resources
Ex: mates, food
Heritable variations:
members of a species differ due to the genes they inherit
Ex: moths were different colors
Natural selection:
individuals who inherit genes that give them a survival advantage will more likely pass on their genes to the next generation
Ex: moths who were darker were able to blend in with the newly darkened trees
Evolutionary:
Our hunter and gatherer ancestors who had a taste for fats and sugars survived and passed their genes to the next generation
This is why we like fats and sugars
Naturalistic Fallacy:
If it worked for our ancestors, then it must work for us
"Biopsychosocial" approach:
approach for levels of analysis of multiple perspectives to explain behaviors
Mental health perspectives:
Humanistic
Psychoanalysis
Quantitative Research Designs:
survey when a researcher asks participants a series of questions via internet or paper questionaire.
Longitudinal:
researcher studies the same group of individuals over an extended period
Quasi Experimental:
researcher measures & compares the behaviors or thoughts of 2+ pre existing groups of people
Naturalistic Observation:
researcher secretly observes & record the behavior of people in public settings
Correlational:
how closely two variables are related
Experimental:
Researcher controls one variable that is hypothesized to cause the second variable
Longitudinal:
researcher studies the same group of individuals over an extended period of time
Ex: 14,376 typically middle aged participants, who either had or hadn't had head injuries, were asked the same questions over 25 years. Found that people who did have head injuries were more likely to develop dementia.
Quasi Experimental:
researcher measures & compares the behaviors or thoughts of 2+ pre existing groups of people
Ex: researchers research the benefits of being imaginative, found that people that could imagine a situation were more likely to have more of a response than people that cannot.
Naturalistic Observation:
researcher secretly observes & record the behavior of people in public settings
Ex: observe at an intersection or crosswalk and see what kind of car obeys the law and common courtesy
Correlational:
how closely two variables are related
Correlation coefficient: a number signifying the relationship between two variable
symbolized as "r" ranges from +1.00 to -1.00
Positive: score high on variable 1 tend to score high on variable 2.
Negative: score high on variable 1 tend to score low on variable 2
Strength: of a relationship, how reliable is the relationship between the variables
Limitations: even if correlation is strong, it cannot be said if one coefficient causes another
Correlational studies limitations:
Reason 1: Unknown cause and effect direction
don't know which one is causing the other
Does V1 cause V2, or
Does V2 cause V1?
Relationship satisfaction->self care
self care->relationship satisfaction
Reason 2: The third variable problem:
there could be a third variable that is the real cause of variables one and two
V1 <- V3 -> V2
relationship satisfaction<- self esteem ->self care
Tell each correlation.
A) Positive
B) Negative
C) No
The correlation coefficeint between alcohol consumption and coordination is r=-.73. The strength of this correlation coefficient is:
strong
The correlation coefficient between the number of cigarettes students smoke each day and students' GPA is r=+.09. The strength of this coefficient is:
no relation
The correlation coefficient between the number of years people have been alive and their birth year is r=-1.00. The strength of this coefficient is :
perfect
Experimental:
Researcher controls one variable that is hypothesized to cause the second variable
People with PTSD are given a randomassignment. One random group will get MDMA and therapy, the other will get therapy and placebo.
It is the only research where cause and effect is found
Independent Variable: variable that is controlled by the experimenter (the cause)
Ex: the type of therapy/drug
Experimental group: gets the "treatment" (MDMA)
Control group: gets false "treatment" (placebo)
Dependent Variable: variable that is not controlled by experimenter (effect)
Ex: symptoms of PTSD
Experimental research:
Random Assignment:
participants have an equal chance of being in either group
Controls "3rd variables" by equalizing groups
Isolates the Independent Variable
Confounds:
factors that decrease ability to establish the cause and effect
placebo effect: change in participants' reaction due to their expectations about the treatment, not treatment itself
Experimenter bias: a change in participant's behavior due to the experimenter
How to control:
double blind procedures: both participants and experimenter know participants' group
Conclusions of research designs:
Quantitative Research- how many people have certain characteristics
Correlational- how closely variables are related
Experimental- what variable causes which
study does not equal experiment
Why are experimental research designs the gold standard
Provides the most convincing evidence of the relationship between exposure and outcome
Ethics:
Informed consent
participants are given basic information about a study so they can decide if they want to participate
Confidentiallity
researcher hides identity of participants from public
Anonymity
researcher does not collect identifying information
Deception:
when a researcher intentionally decieves or witholds information form participants
Debriefing:
at the end of the study, researchers answer the questions participants have, and fully explain the nature of the study, especially if deception was involved
Stress
a person's physical and psychologicalreaction to an event that is perceived as overwhelming or threatening