Save
resource reliance
Tanzania
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
sim
Visit profile
Cards (15)
population =
51
million
most live in
rural
areas
with
5
million living in
Dar Es Salaam
(port)
location =
South-East
Africa,
northern
hemisphere, neighbours such as
Malawi
are Tanzania food secure?
2015:
GHI
-
28.7
89
/
116
countries
rating -
'serious'
why were Tanzania food insecure?
2012,
44
% were living on
less
than $
1.25
a day
so
can't
afford
to buy
healthy diet
close to the
equator
-
climate
not
suitable for
crops
included lots of
droughts
=
low
crop yield = price
increase
attempt at food security
PAST, LOCAL =
GOAT AID
PAST, NATIONAL =
CANADA WHEAT
PRESENT, NATIONAL =
SAGCOT
goat aid
in the
Babati
district, where
90
% depend on
agriculture
for
livelihood
ran from 1999 = 2006 , funded by
British
charity who spent
£200,000
on
Toggernburg
goats
(
£400
per goat, given on a
loan
basis)
goat aid adv
Toggenburg
goats produce
3l
of
milk
per
day
(compared to a
cow
who produces
1l
)
also provide
meat
,
cheese
=
nutrients
that support
growth
farmers can sell this
extra
produce
to make a
profit
to send
children
to
school
/ buy more
farm equipment
produce
manure
=
fertiliser
= more
variety
of
crops
=
sold
and creates a
balanced diet
breed up to
6 goats
per
pair
goat aid disadv:
small scale
so only
benefitted
a
few villages
requires lots of
water
which is a
scarce resource
expensive
vet
bills
hooves
and
grazing
=
barren
land = increased
desertification
=
reduced
fertility
and
nutrients
of
soil
=
less crops
Canada Wheat programme
(started after
droughts
in early
1970s
were they required emergency aid = recognised the
importance
for
independence
)
Canada provided $
95 million
in aid including:
seeds
machinery
, like
tractors
chemical fertilisers
training
canada wheat programme adv
400
workers
,
150
mechanics
gained
skills
and
121
trained
provided
60%
of Tanzanias wheat which meant that
during the
1992
droughts
Tanzania was the
only
South
African
country
that did
not
rely
on
food
aid
= development
canada wheat programma disadv:
would've been
cheaper
to important
very
few jobs
for a
large scale project
growing only
1 crop
=
worsening food fertility
and lost
biodiversity
Barabaig
tribe were forced of their
grazing lands
, sometimes with
violence
, affecting
40,000
people
machinery fell into
disrepair
as
couldn't
afford
spare
parts
from Canada, benefitting
Canadian
manufactures
stopped in
1993
shows it
wasn't
achieving food security
SAGCOT: southern agricultural growth corridor of Tanzania
began in
2010
: aim to
improve farming
along a
growth corridor
of
fertile soil
stretching from
dar
es
salaam
across the country
included
transport links
such as the
port
and
Tazara
railway
investment from
gov
/
TNCs
/
China
SAGCOT HAS DONE:
188
commercial
farms
which are
linked
to
75,000
small
farms
(which gain support, i.e. can borrow machinery)
$
1140
million
invested into
infrastructure
such as roads/rail/electricity/ water
SAGCOT adv:
better transport
means that food can be
transported
quickly
to be
sold
in
markets
=
less food waste
so
more profits
improved irrigation
means that farmers can
grow all year round
(significant as they are close to
equator
)
created
45,000
jobs
and lifted
2
million
oit of
poverty
Kilombero plantation
commercial farms
have
doubled
their
rice yield
the
small farmed
linked to this produce
8x
more
rice
SAGCOT disadv:
most of the money has
benefited
the
larger
commercial
farms
small
farm owners had
little
control
over
decision
,
seen
through,
nomadic
tribe has
lost
water supply
concentration on
1
or
2
crops shows food
security
is still
threatened
(need a
balanced
diet)
foreign
investors,
china
, benefit more, as the
cheap
rice (from
Kilombero
project) will be eaten in
china
not in
Tanzania