AO1 - what explanation did Dollard and Miller propose?
‘The ‘cupboardlove’ explanation.
Emphasises the importanceoffoodinattachmentformation as children learn to love whoever feeds them.
AO1 - classical conditioning
Learning to associate 2 stimuli.
In attachment, foodistheUS and it leads to the UR (afeelingofpleasure).
AO1 - baby learns that mother produces a sense of pleasure
A caregiver (usually mother) starts as a NS, but as the caregiver provides food over time, they become associatedwithfood so the NSbecomesaCS.
Once conditioning has taken place, the caregiver producesaCRofpleasure.
Learning theorist believe this is the basisoflove.
Through this, an attachment has been formed and the caregiverisnowanattachmentfigure.
AO1 - operant conditioning
Explains why babiescryforcomfort.
Crying leads to a responsefromthecaregiver e.g. feeding.
As long as the caregiver provides the correct response, crying is reinforcedasitproducesapleasurableconsequence.
AO1 - negative reinforcement
At the same time as the baby is reinforced for crying, the caregiver receives negative reinforcementasthecryingstops.
AO1 - drive reduction
Hunger is primary drive.
Searsetal suggested that as caregivers provide food, the drive of hunger becomes generalised to them, therefore attachmentisaseconddrive learned by association.
AO3 - ✖️counter-evidence from animal studies
Lorenz’sgeeseimprinted on the firstmovingobject they saw regardless of whethertheobjectwasassociatedwithfood.
In Harlow’sresearch,monkeysattached themselves to a softmotherrather than the wire mother which providedmilk.
Shows that factors otherthanfeedingareimportant when forming an attachment.
AO3 - ✖️counter-evidence from human studies
SchafferandEmerson showed that for many babies, theirmainattachment was not to the person who fed them.
Isabellaetal found that interactional synchronypredictedattachmentquality.
Both of these factors are notrelatedtofeeding.
This again suggests that otherfactorsaremoreimportant when forming an attachment.
AO3 - ✔️elements of conditioning still may be involved
Seems unlikely that association with food plays a central role in attachment.
However, conditioning may still play some role in attachment.
E.g. a baby may associatewarmthandcomfort with a particular adult, which may influence the baby‘s choiceoftheirmainattachmentfigure.
Means that the learning theory maystillbeusefulinunderstanding the development of attachments.