+It takes into account both nature and nurture. Eysenck’s theory argues strongly that biological predispositions towards certain personality traits, combined with conditioning and socialisation during childhood, create our personality.
+It allows for clear measurement of the personality traits via the EPQ.
+Research evidence to support this theory came from Eysenck’s study of 2070 male prisoners and 2422 male controls. The prisoners scored higher on extraversion, neuroticism and psychoticism than the non-criminal controls.
-The E scale maybe measuring two separate traits, sociability and impulsiveness. Offenders only tend to score highly on impulsiveness.
-While we can find correlations between traits and prisoners, we cannot use that to determine causality.
-Maybe the impulsive criminals get caught, so the prison population is not representative of all criminal activity.
-Eysenck’s tests used self-report questionnaires; these may not produce valid results because people may lie about themselves or not understand the question.
-Farrington’s research could find no link between prisoners and extraversion, though he did find that prisoners tended to be neurotic and psychotic.