Cognitive load refers to the total amount of mental effort being used in the working memory during learning.
Languages are sets of signs that combine an exponent (a sequence of letters or sounds) with a meaning
Grammar is a way to generate signs from more basic signs
Language is a means to communicate, it is a semiotic system
A sign in language consists of a signifier (any material thing that signifies) and a signified (the concept that a signifier refers to)
Signs combine a form and a meaning, and they are identical with neither their exponent nor with their meaning
Language acquisition is a natural, subconscious process where children acquire language through meaningful interaction without being aware of grammatical rules
Children acquire their first language(s) by repeating what is said to them and getting a feel for what is correct
Children who grow up with multiple languages acquire them naturally by repeating what they hear and using them purposefully in communication
Language learning is the result of direct instruction in the rules of language, usually with a basic knowledge of grammar of their first languages
When learning a new language, there is a deductive approach to intonations, phonology, morphology, and syntax
Signs (letters and letter combinations) represent sounds and by combining them, we form words that convey meaning
Language acquisition does not require extensive use of conscious grammatical rules and does not require tedious drill
Krashen's Theory of Second Language Acquisition includes the Acquisition-Learning distinction, Monitor hypothesis, Input hypothesis, and Natural Order hypothesis
The Acquisition-Learning distinction states that there are two independent systems of foreign language performance: 'the acquired system' and 'the learned system'
The Monitor hypothesis explains the relationship between acquisition and learning, where the learning system acts as a 'monitor' for correctness
The Input hypothesis suggests that language learners acquire language by understanding input in the target language through natural communication
Krashen also discusses individual variation among language learners in their use of the 'monitor' as over-users, under-users, or optimal users
An evaluation of a person's psychological profile can help determine their 'monitor' use group
Extroverts are often under-users, while introverts and perfectionists are over-users of the 'monitor'
Lack of self-confidence is frequently related to the over-use of the 'monitor'
Krashen's Input hypothesis explains how learners acquire a second language
The hypothesis is concerned with 'acquisition', not 'learning'
Learners improve and progress along the 'natural order' when they receive second language 'input' that is one step beyond their current stage of linguistic competence
Acquisition takes place when learners are exposed to 'Comprehensible Input' that belongs to level 'i + 1'
Krashen suggests that natural communicative input is key to designing a syllabus to ensure each learner receives appropriate input for their current stage of linguistic competence
Krashen's Affective Filter hypothesis explains the role of 'affective variables' in second language acquisition
Variables include: motivation, self-confidence, anxiety, and personality traits
Learners with high motivation, self-confidence, good self-image, low anxiety, and extroversion are better equipped for success in second language acquisition
Low motivation, low self-esteem, anxiety, introversion, and inhibition can raise the affective filter and prevent comprehensible input from being used for acquisition
Positive affect is necessary, but not sufficient on its own, for acquisition to take place
Krashen's Natural Order hypothesis is based on research findings that suggest the acquisition of grammatical structures follows a 'natural order'
Some grammatical structures tend to be acquired early while others late, independent of learners' age, L1 background, and conditions of exposure
There is a Natural Order of language acquisition, but Krashen rejects grammatical sequencing when the goal is language acquisition
Human Language versus Animal Language
Human language is symbolic, using a set number of sounds and characters, allowing ideas to be recorded and preserved
Animal communication is not symbolic and cannot preserve ideas of the past
Human language can arrange words into an infinite number of ideas, while animals have a limited number of combinations for communication
Human language is referential, used to exchange specific information about people or objects and their actions