the belief that children learn to love whoever feeds them
what is used to explain cupboard love?
classical conditioning
Dollard and Miller:
hungry infant feels uncomfortable - drive to reduce discomfort
when fed the drive is reduced and it produces pleasure (reward)
food becomes primary reinforcer
person supplying the food becomes a secondary reinforcer and a source of reward in their own right
strength - conditioning could still be involved
probably not food but a baby could get attached to a caregiver that has become associated with warmth and comfort
HOWEVER this ignores the fact that babies take a very active role in attachment. they imitate interactions - Feldman
Weakness - counter evidence from animal studies
Lorenz's goslings imprinted on the first moving thing they saw and Harlow's monkeys preferred the cloth monkey with no nourishment
Weakness - counter evidence from human studies
Schaffer and Emmerson showed that for many babies their main attachment was not to the person who fed them. Isabella et al found that intersectional synchrony predicted attachment quality