A theory that argues society is like a biological organism with interconnected parts held together by a 'value consensus'
Functionalist theory of education
Argues that education is an important social institutionthat helps meet the needs of society and maintain stability
Functionalist view on education
Education serves two main functions: manifest (intended) and latent (unintended)
Manifest functions of education
Change and innovation
Socialisation
Social control
Role allocation
Transmission of culture
Latent functions of education
Establishing social networks
Engaging in group work
Creating a generational gap
Restricting activities
Mechanical solidarity
(in Durkheim's theory) Cohesion and integration coming from people feeling and being connected through cultural ties, religion, work, educational achievements, and lifestyles
Organic solidarity
(in Durkheim's theory) Cohesion based on people being dependent on each other and having similar values
Role differentiation
(in Durkheim's theory) Modern societies have complex divisions of labour, so schools help pupils develop specialised skills and knowledge
Particularistic standards
(in Parsons' theory) Children are judged based on the criteria of their particular families, where status is ascribed
Universalistic standards
(in Parsons' theory) Everyone is judged by the same standards, regardless of family ties, class, race, ethnicity, gender or sexuality, where status is achieved
David Hargreaves argues that the education system encourages individualism rather than cooperation
Postmodernists argue that contemporary society is more culturally diverse, and schools do not produce a shared set of norms and values
Marxists argue that schools teach pupils the values of the capitalist ruling class and do not serve the interests of the working class
Feminists argue that schools still teach patriarchal values, disadvantaging women and girls in society
Ascribed statuses
Social and cultural positions that are inherited and fixed at birth and unlikely to change
Ascribed statuses
Girls not being allowed to go to school in some communities because they view it as a waste of time and money
Parents donating money to universities to guarantee their children a place
Hereditary titles such as Duke, Earl, and Viscount that give people a significant amount of cultural capital
Universalistic standards
Everyone is judged by the same standards, regardless of family ties, class, race, ethnicity, gender or sexuality
Achieved statuses
Social and cultural positions that are earned based on skills, merit and talent
Achieved statuses
School rules apply to all pupils
No one is shown favourable treatment
Everyone takes the same exams and is marked using the same marking scheme
Meritocracy
A system which expresses the idea that people should be rewarded based on their efforts and abilities
Parsons argued that both the education system and society are based on 'meritocratic' principles
Meritocratic principle
Teaches pupils the value of equality of opportunity and encourages them to be self-motivated
Pupils gain recognition and status through their efforts and actions only
By testing them and evaluating their abilities and talents, schools match them to suitable jobs, while encouraging competition
Those who do not do well academically will understand that their failure is their own doing because the system is fair and just
Myth of meritocracy
Meritocracy persuades the proletariat to believe that the capitalist ruling class obtained their positions through hard work, and not because of their family ties, exploitation, and access to top educational institutions
Bowles and Gintis (1976) argued that capitalist societies are not meritocratic
Meritocracy is a myth designed to make working-class pupils and other marginalised groups blame themselves for systemic failures and discrimination
The criteria by which people are judged serve the dominant culture and class, and do not take into account human diversity
Educational attainment is not always an indicator of what job or role someone might take up in society
Davis and Moore's theory of social stratification
Views social inequalities as necessary for functional modern societies because it motivates people to work harder
The most talented and qualified pupils are selected for the best roles
This does not necessarily mean they achieved their position because of their status; it is because they were the most determined and qualified
Social stratification
Functions as a way of allocating roles
What happens in schools reflects what happens in wider society
Individuals have to prove their worth and show what they can do because education sifts and sorts people according to their abilities
The longer someone remains in education, the more likely they are to get a well-paid job
Inequality
A necessary evil
The tripartite system was criticised for restricting the social mobility of working-class pupils
Functionalists would argue the system helps motivate working-class pupils placed in technical schools to work harder