Bowlby's monotropic theory believes attachments between infant and the caregiver are innate
theories like imprinting and attachment evolved because they ensured young animals were close to caregivers thus protected from hazards
Bowlby believed infants were born with social releasers
social releasers are innate 'cute' behaviours e.g. smiling, crying or features e.g. big eyes
the purpose of social releasers is to activate social interaction so attachment can be formed via reciprocal behaviour
Bowlby proposed a critical period of 2-3 years
if an attachment isn't formed within this time, infants will find it harder to form attachments in the future
Bowlby also argued that infants form a monotropic relationship with primary attachment figure
the more time spent with the primary attachment figure, the better
impact of monotropic figure
law of continuity: more consistent the infant's care, the better quality of attachment
law of accumulated separation: effects of separation add up; 'safest dose is zero dose'
internal working model: relationship with primary attachment forms a 'template' for what all relationships are like
child with loving relationship with reliable caregiver = expectation all relationships are loving and reliable
child with poor treatment = expectation of poor treatment from others
may also affect the infants later ability to parent
AO3: weakness - socially sensitive - suggest that working mothers may negatively affect their child's emotional development + gives mother blame for future behaviour
CA: Bowlby's theory doesn't require a female to be the 'monotropic figure'