Observation: A non-experimental technique, the researcher watches and records the spontaneous and natural behaviour of the participants withoutmanipulating levels of the IV
Controlled observation: Watching and recording behaviour in a controlled environment, such as a lab.
Advantages of controlled observations:
High internal validity: extraneous variables are less likely to be responsible for observed behaviour
Results are reliable due to same standardised procedures
Disadvantage of controlled observations:
Low external validity: behaviour is studied in an artificial setting so cannot be applied to real life setting
Naturalistic observation: Watching and recording behaviour in the setting in which it would normally occur
Advantages of naturalistic observations:
High realism: participants are likely to show naturalistic behaviour
HIgh external validity: behaviour is more likely to be generalisable to other situations
Disadvantages of naturalistic observations:
Reduced internal validity: uncontrolledextraneous variables may be responsible for the behaviour observed
Unreliable: lack of control over research situation makes replication difficult
Overt observation: Participants' behaviour is watched and recorded with their knowledge and consent
Advantage of overt observations:
Ethical: principle of informed consent means participants should agree to take part in the research and should know what they are signing up for
Disadvantages of overt observations:
Demand characteristics: may try to show behaviour that they think the researcher wants to see
Social desirability bias
Covert observation: Participants' behaviour is watched and recorded without their knowledge and consent
Advantage of overt observations:
High internal validity: More likely to show naturalistic behaviour free from demand characteristics or social desirability bias
Disadvantage of covert observations:
Unethical: Participants can't give informed consent
Participant observation: Researcher joins the group being observed and takes part in the group's activities and conversations
Advantage of participant observations:
High internal validity and can build rapport: can make participants behave more naturally and disclosing more
Disadvantage of participant observation:
Can lose objectivity, interpretation of behaviour is biased, seeing only from the participants' perspective
Non participant observation: The researcher is separate from the participants whose behaviour they are watching and recording
Advantage of non participant observation:
More likely to remain objective in their interpretation of the participant's behaviour
Disadvantage of non participant observation:
Lacks trust and rapport: researcher misses out on important insights
Observational design: the choice of behaviours to record and how they are measured
Operationalised behavioural categories: The behaviours need to be clearly identifiable and measurable
Behavioural categories: Used in structured observations where target behaviours are put into behavioural categories
Time sampling
A target individual group or individual is observed and the researcher records their behaviour in a fixed time frame
Advantage of time sampling:
More flexibility to be able to record unexpected types of behaviour
Disadvantage of time sampling:
Can miss behaviour that happens outside of the recording periods
Event sampling
A target behaviour is established from the list of the operationalised behavioural categories and the researcher records the event every time it occurs
Advantage of event sampling
As long as the behaviour has been included in the list of behavioural categories it should be recorded if it happens at any stage of the observation
Disadvantage of event sampling:
May miss relevant behaviour that isn't in the list of behavioural categories
Inter-observer reliability
The extent to which there is an agreement between two or more observers involved in observations of a behaviour
Measured by correlating the observation of the two or more researchers
> +0.8
Stages of inter-observer reliability
Agree on the behavioural categories to be used
Observers observe behaviour individually at the same time
Observers compare the data and discuss any different interpretations
Observers analyse the data by using a test of correlation to assess the strength between the two data sets
Self report techniques: The participant reveals personal information about themselves through a series of questions
Interviews
A live encounter where one person asks a set of questions to assess person's thoughts and experiences
Questionnaires
A set of written questions used to assess a person's thoughts or experiences
Open questions
The question is phrased in a way that allows the participant to answer in any way they choose
Produces qualitative data
Closed questions
The question has a fixed set of responses that's determined by the person who sets the questions
Produces quantitative data
Advantage of open questions
Increased validity: participants have the freedom to choose their responses
Disadvantage of open questions
Data analysis between large numbers of participant responses are more difficult, making it harder to spot patterns in responses
Advantage of closed questions
Easy data analysis between large numbers of participant responses, making it easier to spot patterns in the data set