Variances are likely to be interrelated and cannot usually be assessed individually
Standard costing (and variance analysis) may suffer from similar deficiencies as budgeting, depending on its application
Sales mix and quantity variances
Divides sales volume variance into a sales quantity variance (changes in sales volume) and sales mix variance (changes in sales mix)
Sales mix and quantity variances
Explains how the sales volume variance is affected by a shift in the physical volume of sales and a shift in the relative mix of products.
Note – sometimes the word ‘margin’ is used instead of ‘contribution’
Sales mix variance
It shows how the total contribution (or profit) is affected by customers buying different proportions of the products we sell, each of which will have a different budgeted contribution.
Sales quantity variance
It shows how the total contribution (or profit) is affected by customers buying different total quantities of our products, but at the budgeted proportions.
Mix variance shows which products were bought relatively more/less by customers
Favourable sales mix Variance
Suggests higher contribution earning products were bought in greater quantities than expected
Adverse sales mix Variance
Suggests lower contribution earning products were bought in greater quantities than expected
Quantity variance shows if overall unit sales were higher or lower than budgeted
Favourable
sales quantity variance
suggests a larger quantity of units were bought overall than budgeted
Adverse
sales quantity variance
suggests a smaller quantity of units were bought overall than budgeted
§Possible reactions to variances:
•Amend advertising strategy
•Review pricing policy
•Improve/replace/withdraw product
Advantages of standard costs
Enable management by exception
Can promote economy and efficiency
Advantages of standard costs
Can simplify bookkeeping by recording jobs at standard costs instead of actual costs
Are useful in a system of ‘responsibility accounting’
Variances only useful if reported on a timely basis
Variance analysis often tends to focus on the negative. This can have a negative impact on staff morale and behaviour if used inappropriately
Favourable variances can be as bad as adverse variances.
Meeting the standard can become the main objective, at the expense of equally or even more important objectives such as quality or customer satisfaction
Just meeting the standards may not be sufficient when the competitive environment demands continuous improvement