Egalitarianism is equal sharing of outfits and costs
Egalitarianism is a justifiable way of allocating resources, however it may not be feasible or the best
Egalitarian methods may not be par metro efficient if there is a solution where the costs are unequal but lower for both parties
Unanimity means that if everyone prefers x to y, then y should not be used
Paretoinferiority is when a decision is made where both parties can be better off of a different decision was made
Maximin is when you make the worst off person least worst of- the minimum utility is maximised
Anonymity is when the utility vector is rearranged in order of highest to lowest value
Leximin is when the maximin is inconclusive, so you must choose the option where the second worst case scenario is the best
Classical utilitarianism is when the total cost of each decision is added up, then the option with the lowest total cost is selected
The plurality rule is used in voting
The plurality rule is used when each voter casts one vote, and the candidate with the most votes wins
Condorcetvoting means that the winner is the candidate who would beat all other candidates in a head-to-head battle, even if they didn’t receive the highest number of votes
There may not be a Condorcet winner, if a>b, b>c, but c>a, so it cycles in majority
the borda rule gives points for every rank (like Eurovision)
there are profiles where the concordant, bordent and plurality winners are all differeny
There are 3 acceptible sets of axioms, U, P and IIA. With these in place, it is impossible to find a reasonable outcome for the whole society, so the only ranking we can use is a dictatorship
no scoring rule satisfies all desireable assumptions
U is unrestricted domain. individuals can have any preference, and they are not restricted
P is Pareto. If everyone prefers X to Y, then society should chose X
IIA is independence of Irrelevant Alternatives; that the social preference of X and Y should only depend on individuals' preferences of X and Y