Save
...
Paper 2
Law making
Doctrine of precedent
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
charlotte brown
Visit profile
Subdecks (3)
Evaluation of precedent
Law > Paper 2 > Law making > Doctrine of precedent
5 cards
Courts and precedent
Law > Paper 2 > Law making > Doctrine of precedent
8 cards
Judicial precedent
Law > Paper 2 > Law making > Doctrine of precedent
6 cards
Cards (28)
Stare decisis –
‘let what has been decided stand’
Where the point of law in the
present
case and a
previous
case are the
same
, the court must follow the decision of the
previous
case.
Ratio decidendi –
‘the reason for deciding’
This is the legal
decision
of the case –
binding
precedent
Obiter Dicta –
‘other things said’
Hypothetical situations considered by a judge that are
not
part of the decision – can be considered
persuasive precedent
.
Original precedent – if a point of law has
never
been decided, whatever the judge decides will form new
precedent
(
Donoghue
v
Stevenson
)
Binding precedent – what
must
be followed by all courts of the
same
level or
below.
Persuasive precedent – what may be followed
Persuasive precedent
o
Obiter dicta
o Decisions in courts of other
countries
o Decisions of the
Privy Council
o
Dissenting
judgements
Decisions in courts of other countries
R v
R
– based a decision off of a similar case in
Scotland
Decisions of the Privy Council
Rare but
highly
persuasive – final
appeal
court for some commonwealth countries.
Dissenting judgements
Where a decision was reached by judge
majority
, the reasons of the judges in the
minority
are called dissenting judgements.
o
Crane Christmas
followed dissenting judgements in
Hedley Byrne v Heller
See all 28 cards