What does Bruce argue about religion causing social change?
he accepts that religion can cause social change but makes two key points
religion is only effective in certain conditions
ability to cause change is weaker today due to secularisation
How does Bruce support his argument?
he supports his argument by using two case studies
American Civil rights Movement
Liberation Theology in Latin America
2 strengths for Bruces view of religion as a force for social change
Clear world example of religion driving change - religion gave movement moral authority, community organisation and leadership
religion worked because it aligned with national values - christian ideals fit with American values of freedom, democracy and justice helping the movement gain widespread support
2 weaknesses for Bruces view of religion as a force for social change
wouldn't apply in more secular societies - religion may lack the influence or cultural relevance to inspire mass change
religion wasn't the sole cause of success - political activism, media pressure and legal action also played key roles - religion was part of a much wider movement