Poli 220 Tilly

Cards (26)

  • According to Tilly: Medieval Africa was...
    -Sparsely populated (low returns to agriculture)
    - the land itself is not of much value
    - sheer distance protects rulers from external rivals
    - rulers have little incentive to gain and hold territory or engage in war over territory
    - labour (people) is valuable
    - incentivizes slavery
    - so much space allows disgruntled subject to easily exit
    - extraction is light and sporadic
    - endemic weakness of African state reflects a medieval predecessor that did not need to develop the sinew of the modern states (strong armies and bureaucracies)
  • According to Tilly: Medieval Europe was ...
    - densely populated, so agricultural returns were high
    - strong incentive for rulers to gain and hold territory both for extraction and security
    - result in endemic/existential warfare
    - incentivized rulers to establish strong armies and bureaucracies
  • Tilly's argument is...
    - development of the modern state was unanticipated by-product of an evolutionary process
    -endemic war-fare systematically eliminated rulers and entities who failed to extract sufficient resources to arm a military capable of eliminating their internal and external rivals
    - city states are too small to maintain with this war-fare (size limits economies of scale)
    - empires fall becuase they are too decentralized and invite internal rivalry
    - states are just right at making warfare
  • Tilly's argument is not...
    -early warlords intentionally developed the modern state
    - the rise of the modern state was inevitable
  • According to Tilly: extraction
    - to acquire the resources to carry out above
    - requires systems of taxation and accounting
  • According to Tilly: protection
    - to eliminate threats to clients
    - requires assemblies, petitions, courts
    (channels via clients can call on ruler)
    - eliminating or neutralizing the enemies of their clients
  • According to Tilly: state-making
    -eliminate internal rivals
    - requires instruments of surveillance and control (reason for census)
    - eliminating or neutralizing their rivals inside those territories
  • According to Tilly: war making
    - eliminate external rivals
    - requires armies and military technology
    - eliminating or neutralizing their own rival outside the territory in which they had clear and continuous priority as wielder of force
    -fundamental cause of state-formation/ exogenous
  • How does Tilly see state coercion used for 4 key activities
    how/why state use violence
    1. war-making
    2. state-making
    3. protection
    4. extraction
  • According to Tilly: What does "War makes the state... state makes war" mean
    states are in the business of violence
  • According to Tilly: Bureaucracy in state formation
    builds the military (i.e. conscription)

    AND census
    - facilitates conscription to provide soldiers

    taxation
    - provides revenue for military
    - institutions like fixed-field agriculture, slavery, and serfdom facilitate extraction
    - naval power likewise facilitates extractions - ports, customs, duties, trade flows
  • According to Tilly: key institutions of state formation
    Military and Bureaucracy
  • According to Tilly: The elimination of internal rivals and the development of the capacity to extract resources is the process of...
    State formation
  • According to Tilly: The need to compete with external and internal rivals creates a need for ....
    rulers to raise revenue to fight wars
  • According to Tilly: Example of successful state-owned enterprises
    Taiwan
    - Allowed agriculture to remain private, but regulated the issue of surplus extraction and maintaining motivation of accumulation by managing a small industry- fertilizer industry
  • According to Tilly: State owned enterprises
    Supersedes a market of private capital accumulation
    - Ex) ICBC makes it difficult to car insurance companies to expand
    Allows the state to enmesh their goals in the market
    - Often in areas that only the rich could afford to tap into otherwise
    Can help accumulation by lowering costs of manufacturing industries
    - Ex) government regulated or supported electricity, steel, petroleum refinement industries
  • According to Tilly: Decentralization vs Centralization
    Issue: many types of state actions require decentralization for maximum efficiency
    The more centralized
    - The easier it is for information and commands to get distorted or lost
    - Less outside influence
    - More efficient
  • According to Tilly: Examples of failed state distribution
    INCRA Failed to follow
    market logic
    - Production in this new land wasn't economically rewarding
    societal instituions
    = Couldn't legally ensure clear entitlement of the land to colonist
    Tanzania
    - Farmers wasn't economically rewarding enough in comparison to peasantry
    - Failed to ensure entrepreneurs would have sufficient resources to make it worth it
  • According to Tilly: Failed state distribution occurs when
    Information is acquired incorrectly
    Must assess
    - administrative information
    - social issues
  • According to Tilly: What features of the state apparatus make state intervention more effective?
    - Reshape core participants into having the same goals and priorities so that they become one body
    Otherwise
    - Things take longer to achieve
    - Focus is difficult
  • According to Tilly: The efficacy of the state will always depend on
    how they balance what's required for the common good
  • According to Tilly: Common good is to
    balance maintaining:
    - sovereignty
    - defense
    - institutional infrastructure
    - internal peace
    While facilitating
    - individuality and groups
  • According to Tilly: Why can't the state claim to work in the universal interest?
    Tension: If it's that, then it can't be an
    - autonomous body
    - dominating body
  • According to Tilly: Why is the state as being structured as a corporate actor(structured organization of many) problematic?
    - each state elite having their own will will prevent unified action
    - Outside groups may use the state as a means to their interests
  • According to Tilly:
    "If we do not trust individuals in the state of nature, why should we trust representatives of the state who have even more power"
    - The provider of our security os more likely to be a threat to the purchaser
  • According to Tilly: (pre- Bellicist Theory of the State)
    -states should be viewed as extortion or protection rackets
    -state provides citizens with security (the state) for revenue
    - argues the seller of security (state) represents a key threat to the buyer's (citizens) continued security