Adornoetal believed that high levels of obedience is a psychologicaldisorder and believed the cause of this is due to the individualspersonality.
AO1 - exaggerated respect
Adornoetal argued that people with Authoritarianpersonality (AP) have exaggerated respect for authority and submissiveness to it.
They view society as ‘weaker’ than it once was, so believe we need strong,powerful leaders to enforce traditionalvalues.
AO1 - forms in childhood
AP forms in childhood through harshparenting – extremely strictdiscipline, expectations of completeloyalty, impossibly highstandards, and severe criticisms.
Also if parents give conditionallove – love and affection depends on how their child behaves.
AO1 - resentment and hostility
These childhood experiences create resentment and hostility in a child, but they can’t express these feelings directly against their parents as they fear punishment.
So their feelings are displaced onto others who are weaker - this is scapegoating.
This is a psychodynamic explanation.
AO1 - procedure
Adornoetal studied more than 2000middle class, whiteAmericans and their unconscious attitudes towards other ethnic groups.
Several scales were developed, e.g. the F-scale.
AO1 - findings
Adornoetal found that authoritarians (scored high on the F-scale), identified with ‘strong’ people and were disrespectful of the ‘weak’.
They were conscious of their own and others’status, showing excessive respect to those of higher status.
Authoritarians also had a cognitive style where there was no ‘fuzziness’ between categories of people, and had fixed and distinctivestereotypes about other groups.
AO3 - ✔️evidencethatauthoritariansareobedient
Elms and Milgram interviewed 20fullyobedient participants from Milgram‘s original study.
They scored significantly higher on the F-scale than a comparison group of 20disobedient participants.
Suggest that obedient people may share many other characteristics with AP people.
AO3 - counterpoint; evidence that authoritarians are obedient
Subscales of the F-scale showed that obedient participants had characteristics that were unusual for authoritarians.
E.g. they didn’t experience high levels of punishment childhood.
Means that the link between obedience and authoritarianism is complex.
The obedient participants were unlike authoritariasn in so many ways that authoritarianism is unlikely to be a usefulpredictor of obedience.