Sensory register has a huge capacity but duration of less than half a second
Short-term memory is acoustically encoded, has a capacity of 7+/- 2 items, and a duration of 18-30 seconds
Long-term memory is semantically encoded, has unlimited capacity, and very long duration
Types of Long-Term Memory:
Episodic, semantic, procedural memories
Episodic and semantic memories are recalled consciously, procedural memories are recalled unconsciously
Working Memory Model:
STM consists of central executive, phonological loop, visuo-spatial sketchpad, and episodic buffer
Central executive allocates tasks to slave systems
Phonological loop processes auditory information
Visuo-spatial sketchpad combines visual and spatial information
Episodic buffer integrates all data processed by other stores
Explanations for Forgetting - Interference:
Interference can be retroactive or proactive
Retroactive interference demonstrated by McGeoch and McDonald (1931)
Extent of forgetting is larger when memories/materials are very similar
Retrieval failure suggests that forgetting occurs when the 'cues' present at the time of encoding the information are not present at the time of recall
This describes Tulving's 'encoding specificity principle' (ESP)
There are two types of forgetting associated with retrieval failure: context-dependent and state-dependent
Context-dependent forgetting occurs when external cues at the time of encoding do not match those present at recall
Godden and Baddeley (1975) demonstrated this with deep-water divers, showing larger recall in 'matching' conditions
State-dependent forgetting occurs when internal cues at the time of encoding do not match those present at recall
Carter and Cassaday (1998) demonstrated this using anti-histamines to change internal cues
Eysenck suggested that retrieval failure may be a main reason for forgetting from the LTM
Findings from studies of retrieval failure may lack ecological validity
Godden and Baddeley repeated their experiment but found no significant difference in recognition accuracy between matched and non-matched conditions
The encoding specificity principle suffers from cyclical reasoning due to its over-reliance on assumptions
Eyewitness testimony can be influenced by misleading information such as leading questions and post-event discussions
Leading questions suggest a correct answer and can influence participants' responses
Loftus and Palmer (1974) demonstrated this with different critical verbs affecting speed estimates of a car crash
Post-event discussions can lead to memory conformity and inaccurate recall
Gabbert et al (2003) showed high inaccuracy rates from post-event discussions
Own age bias and demand characteristics can affect the accuracy of eyewitness testimony
Participants may recall others from their own age group with higher accuracy
Participants may give answers they think are expected, biasing results
Artificial tasks and stimuli reduce the ecological validity of studies on EWT
Anxiety can have both positive and negative effects on the accuracy of EWT
Johnson and Scott (1976) showed that anxiety can have a negative effect on recall accuracy
Yuille and Cutshall (1986) demonstrated a positive effect of anxiety on recall accuracy
The Yerkes-Dodson Law suggests an 'inverted-U' relationship between arousal and performance
The weapon focus effect may test for surprise rather than anxiety
Ethical issues arise from exposing participants to distressing images and recalling traumatic events
Cognitive interviews aim to increase accurate recall in eyewitness testimony
Stages include reporting everything, reinstating context, changing perspective, and reversing the order of events
The enhanced cognitive interview focuses on social dynamics between the eyewitness and interviewer
The cognitive interview may be time-consuming and require specialist skills
Milne and Bull (2002) found that context reinstatement and reporting everything produced the greatest accuracy of recall