Influence of early attachment on later relationships

Cards (8)

  • How does the internal working model influence later relationships?
    • IWM is a mental representation of a child's first relationship with their primary caregiver - acts as a mental template for future childhood and adult relationships
    • Child with a loving and reliable relationship w/ PCG will assume that this is how relationships are meant to be
    • Will seek out functional relationships and behave accordingly
    • However a child w/ bad experiences may struggle to form relationships or display avoidant and resistant behaviour to friends and partners
  • How does attachment affect relationships in childhood?
    • Kerns (1994): securely attached babies form the best quality childhood friendships, insecurely attached babies have friendship difficulties
    • Wilson and Smith (1998): found secure children were very unlikely to be involved in bullying, avoidant were most likely to be victims and resistant were most likely to be bullies
  • How does attachment affect romantic relationships in adulthood?
    • Hazan and Shaver (1987) analysed 620 replies to a quiz assessing different types of love
    • 56% of respondents that were securely attached were most likely to have good, long-lasting romantic experiences
    • 25% of avoidant respondents tended to reveal jealousy and fear of intimacy
    • Suggest that patterns of attachment behaviour are reflected in romantic behaviour
  • How does attachment affect parental relationships with children in adulthood?
    • Bailey et al. (2007) assessed 99 mothers and their 1 year old babies
    • Measured mother's attachment to their babies and to their own primary attachment figures using Strange Situation
    • Majority of women had the same attachment classification with their own babies as they did with their mothers
  • What is one strength of research into attachment and later relationships?
    • Research support: Fearon and Roisman (2017) reviewed evidence and concluded thar early attachment consistently predicts later attachment, emotional wellbeing, and attachment to own children
    • The strength of the relationship between early attachment type and later development depends on the type of attachment, like his disorganised attachment is strongly associated with later disorder
    • Means secure attachment as a baby appears to convey advantages for future development while disorganised attachment appears to disadvantage children - supporting theories
  • What is one limitation of research into attachment and later relationships?
    • Retrospective data: most research linking early attachment and later development isn't longitudinal meaning researchers usually ask adolescent/adult ppts. questions about their relationships to identify their attachment types
    • This data is reliant on honesty and accurate perception of participants and means it is hard to know whether it is early attachment that is being assessed or adult attachment
    • Measures of early attachment used in most studies may be confounded by other factors making them meaningless
  • What is another limitation of research into attachment and later relationships?
    • Determinist: theory suggests that insecurely-attached children are doomed to struggle with later relationships, implying a lack of free will and self-fulfilling prophecies may occur
    • Other research suggests that insecurely-attached children can go on to experience happy and fulfilling relationships - and that attachment types are not the only factor that affect relationships (biological, innate personality factors)
    • Suggests attachment isn't as strongly linked to relationship development as thought
  • What is another limitation of research into attachment and later relationships?
    • Mixed evidence for continuity of attachment type: some studies do appear to support continuity and provide evidence to support internal working models
    • Zimmerman (2000) assessed infant attachment type and adolescent attachment to parents and found little correlation between quality of infant and adolescent attachment
    • This means the outcome is not what would be expected if the internal working models were important in development, challenging the central predictions of the IWM's theory