A form of social influence where an individual follows a direct order usually issued by someone of authority who has the power to enforce punishment when obedient behaviour is not forthcoming
What was Milgram's baseline procedure?
Milgram (1963): sample included 40Americanmale volunteers who were given the role of 'Teacher' whilst confederates were given the role of 'Learner'
Learners had to remember pairs of words and were quizzed by Teachers who had to deliver electric shocks when they made errors, ranging from 300 - 450 V (330V marked as lethal)
Experimenter's role was to give a series of orders / prods when the participant refused to administer a shock from a different room, increasing in demand each time they refused
Participants' were assessed on how many volts they were willing to shock the confederate with (obedience levels)
What were Milgram's baseline findings and conclusions?
All participants went up to 300V, 65% went up to 450V
Only 12.5%stopped at 300V
Participants showed signs of extreme tension; sweating, trembling, 3 even had 'full-blown, uncontrollableseizures'
Concluded that people are willing to obey orders even when they might lethally harm others
What is one strength of Milgram's research?
Research support: findings were replicated in a French documentary made about reality TV
Beauvois et al (2012): focused on a game show where participants were paid to give [fake] electric shocks to other participants [actors] in front of an audience - 80% delivered maximum shock of 460V
Behaviour was almost identical to Milgram's participants when showing signs of anxiety - supporting Milgram's findings about obedience to authority
What is one limitation of Milgram's research?
Lowinternalvalidity: Orne and Holland (1968) argued participants were 'play-acting' and didn't really believe in the set-up
Perry (2013) reported that only half of Milgram's ppts. believed the shocks were actually real and 2/3rds of these ppts. were disobedient
Suggests participants may have been responding to demand characteristics trying to fulfil the aims of the study rather than acting genuinely
What is another strength of Milgram's research?
Highexternal validity: Hofling et al (1966) covertly observed the behaviour of doctors and nurses - found that 95% of nurses obeyed a confederate doctor over the phone to increase the dosage of a patient's medicine to double what is advised on the bottle
Suggests everyday individuals are still susceptible to obeying destructive authority figures, increasing the external validity of Milgram's research
What is another limitation of Milgram's research?
Ethical issues: deception involved as participants believed they were taking part in a study on 'memory'
Psychological harm was inflicted upon participants, showing signs of physiological distress such as trembling, sweating, and having uncontrollable seizures
Socially sensitive as it suggests those who are responsible for killing innocent people can be excused as it is not their fault but rather the difficulty in disobeyingdestructive orders