possible for sociologists to keep their subjective values out of their research
staying value neutral is impossible > sociologists are humans studying other humans
desirable for sociologists to use their values to improve society
Classical sociologists
Comte and Durkheim (positivist) = sociology should discover the truth about how society works and improve our lives and say with certainty what is best for society
Marx = saw himself as a scientist > thought he discovered truth about society's future and possibility of a classless society emerging
Myrdal and Gouldner
Argued sociologists shouldn't only identify their values but should openly take sides
undesirable to be value neutral > without using their values to guide their research, they put their services up for sale
Value laden
Opinions influenced research
Value free
Opinions haven't influenced research
Funding and careers
Most research is funded by the government and businesses = those paying for research may control its direction
may prevent publication of research if it's findings are unacceptable
sociologists may want to further their careers > influences choice of topic
may censor themselves in fear of harming their career
Values, perspectives and methods, Gouldner
All research is influenced by values
influence different perspectives they choose, concepts they develop and conclusion they reach
Objectivity and relativism
Relativism argues different groups and individuals have different views as to what is true, reflecting their values and interests
no way of judging whether any view is true
Relativism and post modernism
There's no priviledged accounts of society that have access to the truth
no objective truth, what you believe is true is true for you
any perspective claiming to have the truth = meta-narrative based on values/assumptions
Durkheim's study on suicide, positivist
Compared suicide rates between Catholics and Protestants > found less suicides amongst Catholics, and less women committed suicide than men > low levels of integration of individuals caused high rates of suicide
avoids artificiality, no ethical issues
comparative method gives less control over variables than field experiments