Non-renewables are reliable but create environmental problems
Fossil fuels and nuclear energy are reliable
There's enough fossil and nuclear fuels to meet current demand, and they are extracted from the Earth at a fast enough rate thta power plants always have fuel in stock
Always having fuel in stock in power plants means that the power plants can repond quickly to changes in demand
However, these fuels are slowly running out
If not new resources are found, some fossil fuel stocks may run out within a hundred years
While the set-up costs of power plants can be quite high compared to other energy resources, the running costs aren't that expensive
Combined with fairly low fuel extraction costs, using fossil fuels isa cost effective way to produce energy (which is why it's so popular)
Coal, oil and gas release CO2 into the atmosphere when they're burned. All this CO2 adds to the greenhouse effect, and contributes to global warming
Burning coal and oil also releases sulphur dioxide, which causes acid rain - which can be harmful to trees and soils and can have far-reaching effects in ecosystems
Acid rain can be reduced by taking the sulphur out before the fuel is burned, or cleaning up the emissions
Coal mining makes a mess of the landscape, especially "open-cast mining"
As with many energy resources, the view can be spoilt by fossil fuel power plants
Oil spilages cause more serious environmental problems, affecting mammals and birds that live in and around the sea. We try to avoid them, but they always happen
Nuclear power is clean but the nuclear waste is very dangerous and difficult to dispose of.
Nuclear fuel (e.g. uranium or plutonium) is relatively cheap but the overall cost of nuclear power is high due to the cost of the power plant and final decommissioning
Nuclear power always carries the risk of major catastrophe like the Fukushima disaster in Japan