Pitt was in office for a long time, his first ministry ran from December 1783 - March 1801 and then May 1804 till his death in January 1806
He took decisive measures, and created effective reforms
However he also led with very limited opposition in Parliament -> This was because the Whigs were divided
Splits in the Whigs - pre 1789
At the start, the Whigs were dominated by wealthy aristocrats who saw it as their duty to edged the constitutional settlement of 1688
After Rockingham had died in 1782, splits emerged within the Whig faction
Shelburne was the next leader yet he was unpopular and this led to Portland and Fox refused to join Shelburne’s government
Splits the Whigs continued:
Fox and Portland overturned Shelburnes government by joining a coalition with Lord North
This was seen as artifical and unprincipled
Regency Crisis 1788 -> Fox’s position was further harmed s he wanted the Prince of Wales to take over, seemed advocating for royal power
The election of 1784 saw the Whigs lose 100 seats
Splits in the Whigs after 1789:
the French Revolution had divided the Whigs further -> Burke opposed it and Fox saw it as the great hope for the future
Whig aristocrats became more worried as the revolution came more radical
Edmund Burke wrote Reflections on the Revolution in France warning that it would be chaos and blood shed
War Crimes in 1793
supporters had dwindled to around 50
many joined Pitts government
Whig Problems:
Fox though dynamic had a bad reputation as a womaniser and gambler -> he wasn’t liked by the King and he gave a lot of money to the Prince of Wales -> £100 000
publication of parliamentary debates made Fox seem exaggerated and extreme -> lacked detail unlike Pitt
Pitt also supported reform and was against the slave trade -> similar to the Whigs and thus gained their support
The French Revolution had revealed the gaps between fox and the aristocratic Whigs