CL Quiz 2

Cards (47)

    • Liability of accused
  • 3 main concerns of bail:
    • Primary grounds:
    • Is the accused a flight risk?
    • Will they show up for their court hearing?
    • Ties to the community (usually not an issue)
    • Secondary grounds:
    • Is there a likelihood of committing further offences?
    • Is the accused a threat to the safety of society?
    • Circumstances of the offence, including criminal record, especially for breaching court orders (most common concern)
    • Tertiary grounds:
    • Is detention necessary for maintaining confidence in the justice system?
    • Very serious criminal offenses
    • Strength of prosecution's case
  • 60% of cases go to bail hearing, 40% are released from the police station with conditions
    Of all cases, 15% are detained in custody, 85% are released by police or justice of court
  • What should happen at a bail hearing:
    • Presumptions:
    • Person should be released with the least conditions possible
    • Should be released within minimal amount of time (24 hrs)
    • Bail should be according to the Ladder principle (start with the lowest form of release)
    • Should be released on fewest conditions possible
    • Should always do everything possible to benefit the accused
    • Any conditions imposed must be necessary in the circumstances of the case
    • Forms of Release:
    • From the police station - form 10 (with or without conditions)
    • From the court - form 11 (with or without financial obligation, with or without surety)
  • What is a surety:
    • Someone who is willing to take responsibility for the accused
    • Usually someone who knows the accused well (family, friend, co-worker)
    • Might be required to live with the accused (highest form of surety)
    • Surety release is the highest form of release
  • Who bears the Onus at the Bail Hearing:
    • Usually the crown
    • Reverse onus in cases of s. 469 (treason, piracy, etc.)
    • Reverse onus bail hearing under section 515(6) for certain cases like outstanding charges, IPV offences, or failure to comply offences
  • Actus Reus:
    • Defined by statute, enacted by parliament
    • Interpreted by judicial
    • Interpreted to achieve the purpose of enactment
    • Mistake of Law: accused is deemed to know the law, mistake of law is not a defense
    • Di minimis non curat lex: trivial/minor acts are not a concern of the law
    • Causation: many crimes include a necessary consequence of the act, chain of events and thin skull rule are considerations
  • Mens Rea:
    • No solid definition, usually left to judicial interpretation
    • Objective foreseeability vs subjective awareness & intention
    • Objective fault: foreseeability & reasonableness
    • Subjective fault: highest level of Mens Rea, used for intentional acts
    • 4 different levels of Subjective Awareness:
    • Full intention to achieve the prohibited result
    • Knowledge that prohibited result will occur
    • Wilful blindness
    • Recklessness
  • 3 main concerns of bail:
    • Primary grounds:
    • Is the accused a flight risk?
    • Will they show up for their court hearing?
    • Ties to the community (usually not an issue)
    • Secondary grounds:
    • Is there a likelihood of committing further offences?
    • Is the accused a threat to the safety of society?
    • Circumstances of the offence, including criminal record, especially for breaching court orders (most common concern)
    • Tertiary grounds:
    • Is detention necessary for maintaining confidence in the justice system?
    • Very serious criminal offenses
    • Strength of prosecution's case
    • Liability of accused
  • 60% of cases go to bail hearing, 40% are released from the police station with conditions
    Of all cases, 15% are detained in custody, 85% are released by police or justice of court
  • What should happen at a bail hearing:
    • Person should be released with the least conditions possible
    • Should be released within minimal amount of time (24 hrs)
    • Bail should be according to the Ladder principle (start with the lowest form of release)
    • Should be released on fewest conditions possible
    • Should always do everything possible to benefit the accused
    • Any conditions imposed must be necessary in the circumstances of the case
  • Forms of Release:
    • From the police station - form 10 (held for bail hearing in hopes of obtaining form 11), either without conditions or with conditions
    • From the court - form 11 allowed back in the community with a release order
    • Release order, with or without financial obligation
    • With financial obligation - with or without surety
    • Financial obligation can either be a promise to pay (pledge) or deposit
  • Who bears the Onus at the Bail Hearing:
    • Usually the crown
    • Reverse onus in cases of s. 469 (treason, piracy, etc.)
    • Reverse onus bail hearing under section 515(6) for certain cases like accused with outstanding charges and new offences, selected forearm offences, accused not ordinarily a resident of Canada, IPV offences, failure to comply offences, Aboriginal accused or vulnerable populations
  • Actus Reus:
    • Defined by statute, enacted by parliament
    • Interpreted by judicial
    • Interpreted in a manner to achieve the purpose of enactment
    • If ambiguous, should be interpreted to most benefit the accused
    • Mistake of law is not a defence, but may rarely mitigate sentence
    • Di minimis non curat lex: trivial/minor acts are not a concern of the law
    • Very minor transgressions are “di minimis”
    • Some acts, like sexual assault offences and IPV, are NEVER trivial
  • Mens Rea “the guilty mind”:
    • No solid definition, usually left to judicial to decide
    • Includes “purposely,” “knowingly,” “recklessly,” “negligently”
    • Objective foreseeability vs subjective awareness & intention
    • Objective fault: foreseeability & reasonableness
    • Accused’s personal characteristics are irrelevant unless they prevented them from foreseeing as a reasonable person would
    • Subjective fault - highest level of Mens Rea, used for most serious crimes
    • Accused was aware of the result that would occur while committing the act
    • Different levels require different levels of subjective awareness
    • Purpose is to prevent punishment of morally innocent
    • NOT the same as MOTIVE
    • Crown is (almost) never required to prove motive
  • Causation:
    • Many crimes include a necessary consequence of the act
    • Chain of events: were there other events that occurred that may have contributed to the prohibited result
    • Thin skull rule: unforeseeable vulnerability of the victim that accused would not have known
    • General Principle of Causation: Smithers test is the governing test for causation in criminal law
    • Test for causation that requires that the accused’s act be “contributing cause” to the death which includes anything beyond a trivial or di minimis act
    • Causation: a different question in homicide cases
    • Specific provisions in the criminal code address homicide causation
    • SCC has imposed a slightly higher test of causation for murder
  • Parties & Attempts:
    • Criminal liability is not restricted to those who commit a crime
    • Attempted crimes are still crimes
    • Helping in a crime is a crime
    • Person will be liable for punishment of the crime if they helped with the crime
    • Still need actus reus and mens rea
    • Accessory to a crime: not liable for the crime committed by the other person
    • Being an accessory after the fact to a crime is in itself a crime
    • Conspiring to a crime is in itself a crime
  • Voluntariness of the act:
    • For an act to be criminal, it must be voluntary
    • Refers to the physical aspect of the act, if they did act with conscious and voluntary mind
    • Different from mens rea
    • For an act to be criminal, it must be the result of a willing mind, at liberty to make a choice; absent voluntariness = no actus reus
  • Gladue Principle:
    • Extension resulting from Antic case; essentially codifies Antic
    • Necessitates early release with least onerous conditions
    • Includes special considerations for vulnerable minorities
    • Asks court to consider unique systematic and background factors in bail hearing
    • Does not trump primary/secondary/tertiary grounds
    • Applies after sentencing (after accused is deemed guilty)
  • Proper Approach to Bail Moving Forward:
    • Each province seems to have different approaches so moving forward need to take a standard approach with specific release guidelines followed across the country
    • Presumption of innocence
    • Court must explain why a surety is needed (if needed)
    • Need to consider risk to public safety
    • Bail/release needs to be strictly tailored to the offence and accused
    • Breach of bail terms (an offence) will have accused back in court
  • Sentencing and Pre-sentencing Custody:
    • Judge has pre-sentencing custody, time spent in custody can be used to reduce jail time after sentencing (1:1 ratio)
    • Truth and sentencing act changed pre-sentencing credit to 1.5:1 ratio
    • Pre-sentencing credit is used to reduce post-sentence jail time
  • Can an Omission qualify as a Criminal Act:
    • Yes, where person had a legal duty to act and fails to do so
    • Criminal negligence: example parents failing to provide necessities of life, medical practitioner failing to provide treatment, managers in the workplace failing to fulfill legal responsibilities
  • R. v. Nette:
    • Charges for first degree murder of 95-year-old
    • Found guilty of second degree murder
    • Harbottle test if for first degree murder and must be substantial contributing cause
    • SCC decision that for second degree murder “significant” contributing cause (so Smithers test)
  • Javanmardi Case:
    • Old man died after naturopath gave him an injection
    • Naturopath accused of manslaughter and criminal negligence
    • Found guilty of manslaughter, acquitted of both charges after trial judge
    • Failed to arrive at final conclusion
    • 3 elements to actus reus:
    • An underlying unlawful act
    • Objective dangerousness of the act
    • A causal connection between the act and the death
  • First vs Second Degree Murder:
    • First degree: planned & deliberate, death happens during the course of a criminal offence that is unlawful confinement, underlying offence is sexual assault, a murder of a police officer
    • Criminal act must have both actus reus & mens rea, must be combined and simultaneous
    • Smithers test is for second degree murder and manslaughter (significant contributing cause)
    • Harbottle test is for first degree murder (substantial contributing cause)
  • Mistake of Law:
    • Crown never has to prove that the accused knew what the law is
    • Exception: if accused was told something is legal by an authority figure (police) when really it isn’t
    • “Colour of right” a narrow defence in particular crimes, mainly theft where accused genuinely believed something was their property
  • Evidentiary procedures:
    • Crown usually reads the evidence, including allegations of what happened, criminal records, outstanding charges, other relevant info
    • Accused rarely testifies
    • Sureties might be called to testify by defence
    • Sureties encouraged to provide affidavit evidence instead of oral statement
  • Revocation of release if accused misbehaves while on bail - reverse onus
    • Actus Reus defined by statute, enacted by parliament
    • Exception: contempt of court (a common law crime where accused breached court order; not defined by statute but by judicial interpretation)
    • Interpreted by judicial
    • Interpreted in a manner to achieve the purpose of enactment
    • If ambiguous, should be interpreted to most benefit the accused
  • Causation:
    • Many crimes include a necessary consequence of the act
    • Mostly crimes causing bodily harm or death
    • Chain of events: were there other events that occurred that may have contributed to the prohibited result
    • Thin skull rule: unforeseeable vulnerability of the victim that accused would not have known
    • General Principle of Causation: Smithers test is the governing test for causation in criminal law
  • 3 main concerns of bail:
    • Primary grounds:
    • Is the accused a flight risk?
    • Will they show up for their court hearing?
    • Ties to the community (usually not an issue)
    • Secondary grounds:
    • Is there a likelihood of committing further offences?
    • Is the accused a threat to the safety of society?
    • Circumstances of the offence, including criminal record, especially for breaching court orders (most common concern)
    • Tertiary grounds:
    • Is detention necessary for maintaining confidence in the justice system?
    • Very serious criminal offenses
    • Strength of prosecution's case
    • Liability of accused
  • 60% of cases go to bail hearing, 40% are released from the police station with conditions
    Of all cases, 15% are detained in custody, 85% are released by police or justice of court
    What should happen at a bail hearing:
    • Presumptions:
    • Person should be released with the least conditions possible
    • Should be released within minimal amount of time (24 hrs)
    • Bail should be according to the Ladder principle (start with the lowest form of release)
    • Should be released on fewest conditions possible
    • Should always do everything possible to benefit the accused
    • Any conditions imposed must be necessary in the circumstances of the case
    Forms of Release:
    • From the police station - form 10 (being held for bail hearing in hopes of obtaining form 11):
    • Either without conditions or with conditions
    • From the court - form 11 allowed back in the community with a release order:
    • Release order, with or without financial obligation
    • With financial obligation - with or without surety
    • Financial obligation can either be a promise to pay (pledge) or deposit
  • Javanmardi Case:
    • Old man died after naturopath gave him an injection
    • Naturopath is accused of manslaughter and criminal negligence
    • Found guilty of manslaughter, need new case for the criminal negligence after trial judge acquitted both charged
    • Acquittals restored (she's not guilty)
    • Failed to arrive at final conclusion
    • Found that naturopath was qualified and did not depart from what a reasonable person would have done
    • 3 elements to actus reus:
    • An underlying unlawful act
    • Objective dangerousness of the act
    • A causal connection between the act and the death
    • If the accused already has outstanding charges and is charged with new offences
    Selected forearm offences
    If accused is not ordinarily a resident of Canada
    IPV offences (if there’s a record)
    If charged with failure to comply offence
    Aboriginal accused or vulnerable populations
    Crown must pay special attention to background/circumstances of aboriginal people and people belonging to a vulnerable population
  • What is a surety:
    • Someone who is willing to take responsibility for the accused
    • Usually someone who knows the accused well (usually family, friend, co-worker)
    • Might be required to live with the accused (highest form of surety)
    • Surety release is the highest form of release
    Who bears the Onus at the Bail Hearing:
    • Usually the crown
    • Reverse onus in cases of s. 469 (treason, piracy, etc.) - must be detained under s. 515(6) if charged with an indictable offense committed while on bail for an indictable offence
    Reverse Onus bail hearing under section 515(6):