Francis Heidensen adopted a control theory approach to understand the differences in offendingbetweenmales and females
Heidensen suggested that patriarchal control in different spheres of social life led to lower levels of female criminality compared to male criminality
Women are controlled in public through domestic responsibilities and hierarchical structures of employment
This control limits opportunities for women to commit crime, resulting in lower levels of female criminality
Heidensen focused on the dominant ideologies in separate spheres of social life for males and females
Women are dominant in the domestic sphere, limiting their opportunities for criminality
Males are dominant in the public and work spheres, which providesmore opportunities for criminalbehavior
Women's opportunities for crime are restricted by responsibilities in the home, social expectations, and the pressure to be the perfect wife or mother
In the public sphere, women's behavior is controlled by socialexpectations of being submissive to males
Women were often seen as male property in the public sphere, limiting their autonomy and opportunities for criminal behavior
Women are controlled through fear of violent behavior by males to reinforcemaledominance
In the workplace, women are controlled through legitimate authority, with males holding higher positions and having power over femaleemployees
Patriarchal controls in society explain the lower levels of female criminality according to Heidensen
Heidensen's research is somewhat outdated due to changes in family life, gender roles, and social attitudes since the mid-1980s
Some sociologists argue that patriarchal control is enforced not only by males but also by female expectations of their peers, limiting women's opportunities to commit crime
Socialization into informal mechanisms of control, such as gossip, acts as an additional form of control over women, limiting their desire to commit crime