CarryingCapacity (CC) and Limits of AcceptableChange (LAC) are used to reducevisitorimpacts on an area or a resource
Carrying Capacity (CC) defined:
WHEN: 1960s
WHAT:
"the maximum number of people that may visit a tourist destination at the same time, without causing destruction of the physical, economic, socio-cultural environment and an unacceptable decrease in the quality of visitors’ satisfaction" (UNWTO, 1981)
"the maximum number of people who can use a recreational environment without an acceptable decline in the quality of the recreational experience" (Mathieson & Wall, 1982)
Social CC: the maximum use of a tourist resource that can take place without causing unacceptable levels of local negative feeling towards tourism
Ecological CC: the maximum use level that can take place without causing unacceptable damage to the natural environment of the resource
Political CC: the maximum use that can take place of a tourist resource without causing political instability
Categories of Carrying Capacity (CC) (Getz, 1983):
Physical CC: the maximum use of the resource that can take place by tourists before the resource begins to be unacceptably degraded
Economic CC: the maximum use of the resource that can take place by tourists before leading to an unacceptable level of economic dependency on tourism in the area
Perceptual CC: a measurement of tourist’s perceived level of carrying capacity in a tourist resource, beyond which tourists perceive the resource as over-crowded
Carrying Capacity (CC) deals with maximum numbers of tourists at one time to preventdamage
Examples: Sipadan Island = 120 dive permits; Taj Mahal = 40,000 tourists daily/3-hour cap; Inca Trail – 500 trekkers daily
Questions: How many is too many? How do you come up with the maximum numbers? (judgment)
Effectiveness of Carrying Capacity (CC):
McCool and others (2007) state that the experience of recreation CC in resolving issues associated with recreation and tourism development has been a failure
Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) introduced in the 1980s
A process that requires area/resource managers to define desired conditions and take action to maintain/achieve those desired conditions
Types of desired conditions for Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC): resource, social, and management
Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) deals with impacts on area/resource
Aims to minimize changes but doesn't prevent damage completely
Management by objectives approach or an indicator-based approach to management
Steps for Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC):
Identify desired conditions
Identify indicators to indicate the desired conditions
Identify standards to quantitatively measure indicators
Balance desired conditions with reality
Determine management strategy
Effectiveness of Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC):
Introduced in response to the failure of carrying capacity
Proven to be more effective in reducing visitor impacts
A re-framing of the fundamental question in visitor management