LESSON 3

    Cards (11)

    • Specific Factors Model developed by Paul Samuelson and Ronald Jones
    • Assumes an economy that produces two goods and can allocate its labor supply between the two sectors
    • Allows for the existence of factors of production besides labor
    • Manufacturers are produced using capital and labor (but not land)
    • Food is produced using land and labor (but not capital)
    • Diminishing returns in production: each successive person-hour increases output by less than the previous one
    • Assumptions of the Specific Factors Model:
      • Two commodities X and Y
      • Two countries A and B
      • Land, labor, and capital are the three factors
      • Conditions of perfect competition in commodity and factor markets
      • Greater use of labor in country B than in country A
      • Identical production techniques in the two countries
      • Identical tastes and preferences of consumers in the two countries
    • Trade and Relative Prices:
      • Integrated world economy production of manufactures and food is the sum of national outputs of the two goods
      • World's relative supply of manufactures lies between the relative supplies of the two countries
      • World relative price of manufactures lies between the national pre-trade prices
    • Income Distribution and the Gains from Trade:
      • Trade is a source of potential gain for everyone
      • Consumption in the absence of trade would have to be a point on the production possibility frontier
      • Trading economy can consume more of both goods than in the absence of trade
      • It is possible to give each individual more of both goods, making everyone better off
    • The Political Economy of Trade:
      • Optimal Trade Policy: government chooses policies to maximize the welfare of its population
      • Income Distribution and Trade Politics: those who want trade limited are more effective politically than those who want it extended
    • A better way to assess the overall gains from trade is to ask: Could those who gain from trade compensate those who lose, and still be better off themselves?
    See similar decks