Intoxication + eval

Cards (14)

  • 2 issues to be addressed
    1. was the intoxication voluntary or not?
    2. was the offence that was committed a basic intent or specific intent crime?
  • Sheerhan and Moore/ DPP vs Beard
    the mens rea must be completely negated for the defence to succeed
  • Gallagher
    Drunken intent is still intent
  • Majewski
    Voluntary intoxication is NEVER a defence for basic intent crimes
  • Kingston
    Involuntary intoxication includes where the defendant didn't know they were taking an intoxicating substance or taking it due to duress.
    It is a defence to all crimes but the mens rea must be negated.
  • Hardie
    If the defendant takes a sedative drug and it has the opposite effects, they can rely on defence.
  • Bailey
    If they take a prescribed drug and there unexpected side effects they can rely on it but not if reckless.
  • common law - pro
    1. common law allows cases to be heard on merit
  • majewski - pro
    2. MAJEWSKI supports public policy as it protects the public
  • SI crime - pro
    3. defence successful for SI crimes if they didnt have MR- fair on DPP vs BEARD.
  • majewski - con
    1. MAJEWSKI says 'drinking is reckless' - so anyone that drinks is reckless. - UK are a drinking culture- would lose money if got rid of alcohol.
    2. MAJEWSKI contradicts the coincidence rule of actus reus and mens rea- doesnt follow legal principle as need both at the same time.
  • drink and drugs - con
    2. there is no difference between drugs and drink even though drugs are ILLEGAL.
  • BI and SI crime - con
    4. some of the SI crimes dont have a BI fall back alternative meaning they would receive a full crime punishment like theft has no fall back but a s18 does to a s20
  • reforms
    1. Proposal of the Butler Committee and Law Commission- said a max penalty of 1 year for a first offence and rising to 3 years for any later convictions
    2. Make it a full defence? since the D was incapable of forming the MR, the legal principle said that the defendant should be let go- meaning that intoxication would result in a complete acquittal for all crimes.