Indirect observation of an artefact, such as interviews, magazines, articles or diaries. Usually involves changing qualitative data into quantitative by identifying themes
Main features
indirect observation of an artefact
involves identifying categories or themes in an artefact
turns qualitative into quantitative by occurrence of theme/categories
can also produce qualitative data
artefacts sampled through opportunity
Designing
Create an aim and hypothesis for study
read/view the artefact
identify theme/categories
reread and tally every time a theme/category appeares
present quantitative data in grap/table or describe how the categories are presented in the artefact
Evaluation-strengths
high ecological validity as it’s based on real life communication therefore findings can be generalised beyond setting of study
easy to assess reliability of findings and conclusions since researchers can access the same materials and use coding systems to find consistency
Evaluatio-weaknesses
researcher bias as judgment about applying content of artefact to category is subjective and a researcher may interpret content in order to confirm hypothesis, lowers internal validity
hard to establish cause and effect as it only describes data and not conducted under controlled experimental conditions, reduces internal validity