symbolic interactionist-labelling

Cards (9)

  • Rosenthal&Jacobson study labelling
    -gave primary school students a fake IQ test
    -'identified' two types of student to teacher
    -high-flyers:likely to progress quickly
    -low-ability:students likely to struggle
    -12 months later found high flyers has progressed at a rapid rate
    -caused by teachers expectations placed onto students
  • self fufilling prophecy
    as teachers treat students based on how they view them, student will behave that way eventually
  • Ball-Banding
    -students who fathers were non manual workers had the greatest chance of being placed in the top band
    -higher bands were encouraged to have high aspirations and taught in different ways mug+jug principle
  • mug and jug principle
    teacher (jug) pouring more knowledge into student (mug) based on whether they thought theyd be able to take it on
  • Keddie-streaming
    -Teachers modified information on syllabus based on what stream they were teaching
    -middle class students tended to be places in A stream
    -students from manual backgrounds placed into C stream
  • Hargreaves
    -the students viewed as worthless louts by teachers unable to attain high status in school would gain status by misbehaving and being the class clown
  • Elliot-Brown/Blue eyes experiment
    -to see how quickly the children would discriminate against their fellow pupils
    -discrimination was quick and led to violence
  • educational triage
    -students viewed in categories
    • safe bet, A/A* student
    • underachievers C/D students who could get top grades with hard work
    • without hope U grade
  • critique of labelling theory
    -too deterministic
    - Mac an Ghaill:40 asian girls in lower bands labelled as failures, rejected their label and passed all their exams