UK questions

Cards (48)

  • (25) “FPTP should be scrapped” 1/3
    P1- constituency link
    • p: single member constituencies, strong representation
    • c: theories of representation (mandate) + devolution and local authorities
    • e: constituency link is less important
  • (25) “FPTP should be scrapped” 2/3
    P2- governing majorities
    • p: clear majority less coalitions + shuts out extremists
    • c: winner’s bonus, contributes to elective dictatorship + little scrutiny, + FPTP splitting the vote pushes big parties policies
    • e: coalitions still occur + there should be more scrutiny
  • (25) “FPTP should be scrapped" 3/3
    P3- participation
    • p: clear and understandable system + comparisons
    • c: wasted votes, focus on marginal seats, unrepresentative results, two party dominance
    • e: can be better education, FPTP discourages participation
  • (25) “The criticisms against the use of referendums in the UK are unfounded” 1/3
    P1- participation + political education
    • p: enhanced participation and education on a topic, indyref
    • c: low turnout in the case of AV, wording can be manipulated and regulations skirted (brexit)
    • e: generals and locals also have low turnout (sometimes lowers than refs), manipulation also occurs in elections
  • (25) “The criticisms against the use of referendums in the UK are unfounded” 2/3
    P2- legitimation for constitutional change
    • p: devolution, creating increased representation
    • c: tyranny of the majority undermines devolved authority, doesn’t settle debates
    • e: constitutional matters are reserved matters, somewhat counters elective dictatorship, gives convention 
  • (25) “The criticisms against the use of referendums in the UK are unfounded” 3/3
    P3- clashes with representative democracy + parliamentary sovereignty 
    • p: brexit process + clashing theories of representation, simplifies complex processes
    • c: referendums occur through Common’s votes and political pacts within parliament
    • e: these political crises stem from failings in the representative system not referendums as there’s no rule book for when to call referendums
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three post-1997 constitutional changes”
    • Devolution
    • HoL reform
    • Supreme Court
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three principles of the British constitution”
    • Parliamentary Sovereignty
    • Uncodified
    • Rule of Law
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three sources of the British constitution”
    • Statute Law
    • Convention
    • Common Law
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three ways collective and individual rights conflict”
    • Actions of companies
    • Threat of terrorism
    • Recent strike and protest laws
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three arguments for a codified constitution”
    • Greater Transparency
    • Greater protection of rights 
    • Settled devolution
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three theories of representation”
    • Burkean
    • Delegate
    • Mandate
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three stages in the legislative process”
    • First reading
    • Committee stage
    • Ping pong between houses
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three parliament scrutinises the executive”
    • Select committees
    • Opposition days
    • PMQs
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three ways the House of Lords are effective”
    • Experts (Baron Bird and homelessness, Lord Winston, science)
    • Less political polarisation 
    • Focus on scrutiny
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three ways the Opposition are effective”
    • Pose as an alternative government
    • Opposition Days
    • Popularity and relations with the media
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three ways backbenchers influence the government”
    • Backbench rebellions
    • PMBs
    • Select committees
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three ways circumstances that allow pmbs to be successful”
    • Government is supportive (1967 Abortion Act, Liberal MP)
    • The bill is uncontroversial (1996 Dogs Act, dog poo, david amess)
    • Parliamentary arithmetic allows it to be (Cooper-Letwin and Benn Acts)
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three prerogative powers of the prime minister”
    • Patronage
    • Proroguing parliament 
    • Sending out armed forces
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three factors influencing how a prime minister selects their cabinet”
    • Popularity with the public (Gordon Brown)
    • Representing factions of the party (May + Thatcher cabinet)
    • Experience in government (Gove + Hunt)
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three constraints on the power of the prime minister”
    • Supreme Court
    • Opposition
    • Backbenchers
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three circumstances in which ministers resign”
    • Personal conduct
    • Breaking collective responsibility
    • Failure of themselves or department
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three influences on how policy is made”
    • Political deals
    • Social pressure
    • Manifesto pledges and personal convictions
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three ways a Prime Minister is appointed”
    • Winning an election
    • Leader of largest party
    • Coalition leader
  • (25) “Ministers resign most due to personal conduct”
    • Confidence in government
    • Political pressure against them tainting the government
    • Genuine breaches of ministerial code
  • (25) “The UK Prime Minister has little opportunity to dictate policy”
    • Manifesto pledges
    • Appeasing the party 
    • Public backlash 
    • Size of mandate
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three ways in which ultra vires and judicial review are significant”
    • Stops the government from avoiding scrutiny
    • Protects citizen’s rights
    • Manages disputes between devolved bodies
  • (25) “The UK judiciary has become more politicised”
    • Brexit 
    • Devolution
    • Rights
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three benefits of devolution”
    • Cultural representation of regions
    • Allows local political issues to be addressed
    • Appeases nationalist tendencies
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three impacts of devolution on the UK political system”
    • Quasi federal system (different laws)
    • Clashes with parliamentary sovereignty
    • Different electoral systems and different parties (less of a two party system)
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three devolution laws passed”

    • 1998 devolution referendums + laws
    • 2000 Local Government Act
    • 2016 Scotland Act (devo-max)
  • (25) “The case for an English parliament is overwhelming”
    P1- Solve asymmetric devolution
    p: settles the West Lothian question
    c: lack of importance with repeal of EVEL, isolate the union, undermine parliamentary sovereignty
  • (25) “The case for an English parliament is overwhelming” 2/3

    • P2- Cultural representation
    p: rising English nationalism
    c: cultural identity split in England (comparison with other nationalist parties), devolution to cities can solve this 
  • (25) “The case for an English parliament is overwhelming” 3/3

    P3- Increased participation
    p: greater chance for participation that is not London centric, address regional concerns
    c: argument over location, voter fatigue, expensive civil service, lack of enthusiasm 
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three ways collective and individual rights conflict”
    • Actions of companies
    • Threat of terrorism
    • Recent strike and protest laws
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three ways select committees are effective”
    • Independence from executive
    • Direct questioning of ministers
    • Expertise
  • (25) "there should be state funding of political parties" 1/2
    AGAINST
    • Might separate the party from the groups they seek to represent (eg, Labour and trade unions)
    • Might have to fund extremist groups
    • Could entrench two party dominance if its per votes in last election
    • Removes competition and pluralism
    • parties to dependent on the state, stifle active recruitment
  • (25) "there should be state funding of political parties" 2/2
    • 2007 Philips Report proposed funding per voter or member
    • Reduce reliance on wealthy donors and interest groups
    • Politicians to focus on voters over courting wealthy donors
    • Smaller parties have guaranteed funding, levelling the playing field
    • would encourage campaigning in more seats other than just marginal seats
    • easier to limit spending
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three criticisms of the composition of the judiciary”
    • Largely male and all white
    • Oxbridge education
    • Appointments via Law Society are out of public sight
  • (9) “Explain and analyse three divisions within the Labour Party”
    • Corbynites/ hard-left (Jeremy Corbyn, John McDonnell, Zarah Sultana)
    • Soft-left (Angela Rayner, New Deal For Working People)
    • Blairites/ third-way (Tony Blair, Rachel Reeves, Keir Starmer)