Bahrick et al. (1975) study has highexternal validity
Researchersinvestigatedreal-life, meaningfulmemories (peoples’names and faces)
When studies of LTM were conducted with meaninglesspictures, recallrates were lower
Thus, Bahricketal.’sfindings reflect a more‘real’estimate of duration of LTM as they implementedstimuli that depictsreal-life memories
Findings can therefore be applied to everyday human life
Limitation (duration) = methodological issues
Peterson and Peterson (1959) used a sample of 24psychology students
One issue is that the nature of their psychologicaleducation may mean they are familiar with partaking in research and therefore may have demonstrateddemandcharacteristics to assist the experimenter
The research also utilisedartificialmaterials as they were asked to recallnonsense syllables, which is unlikememory in everydaylife
These findings can’t be applied to everydayexamples of memorydue to the lack of external validity