they focus their criticism of God as an 'imaginary being' + on biblical literalism, as if these were mainstream Christian beliefs
they challenge the same minority views that mainstream theology challenges
militant atheists ignore instances where conflict has been waged by atheists regimes e.g. USSR
proxy wars in the Cold War: Korean War, Vietnam War
strawman argument = militant atheists attempt to fault Christianity by defining religious beliefs in over-simplified terms or attributing extreme or minority views to all believers
Alister McGrath was an atheist, but became Christian during his university study
wrote The Dawkins Delusion
McGrath:
Dawkins was wrong in his assumption that good science is bound to result in atheism, citing Francis Collins (director of the Human Genome project + a Christian
further, the theorist behind the Big Bang theory, Georges Lemaitre, was a Catholic priest, who saw no conflict in his beliefs
McGrath:
challenged Dawkins' view that science disproves religion by discussing the relationship between the two
religion + science are 'partially overlapping magisteria'; they come at the world from two different but equally valid perspectives, which can be mutually enriching
McGrath:
criticised Dawkins for his assumption that all Christians adopt views of God + the Bible which are in fact held only by a minority who are fundamentalist - this shows a very limited understanding of Christianity
McGrath:
accuses Dawkins of fundamentalism in his unquestioning acceptance of some atheist views
Dawkins is biased in supporting evidence that agrees with his position - this is a very unscientific approach