Kant's Ethics is sometimes referred to as "deontologism" due to its emphasis on duty or obligation
Morality, according to Kant, is exclusively within the human personality and is determined by intent, motive, and will
Acting morally means doing whatever one is obliged to do, not just acting based on personal desires
Duty is what an individual is obliged to do despite any inclination to do otherwise
There are two main types of duty: perfect duty, which must always be observed, and imperfect duty, which is observed only on some occasions
The essence of morality lies in the nature from which an act is done, and the motive behind the act determines its moral goodness
To determine one's duty in a given situation, actions should be judged based on how they would appear as a universal law through the Categorical Imperative
The Categorical Imperative mandates actions without conditions or regard to consequences, while the Hypothetical Imperative includes conditions or limitations
Two formulations of the Categorical Imperative:
Act only on the maxim that can be willed to become a universal law
Always act to treat humanity, whether yourself or others, as an end and never only as a means
In Ross's Ethics, rightness belongs to acts independent of motives, while moral goodness belongs to motives
Actual Duty is one's real duty in a given situation, while Prima Facie Duty directs what one ought to perform when other relevant factors are not considered
Two principles to resolve cases of conflicting duties:
Act in accordance with the stronger, more stringent, or more severe prima facie duty
Act in accordance with the prima facie duty with a greater balance of rightness or wrongness compared to others
There are 7 types of Prima Facie Duties, including Duty of Fidelity, Duty of Reparation, Duty of Gratitude, Duty of Justice, Duty of Beneficence, Duty of Self-Improvement, and Duty of Nonmaleficence
In medical contexts, discernment and sensitivity are crucial in making moral decisions, and the focus should be on what is right rather than what is useful
Rawls's Theory of Justice combines utilitarianism and deontological views, emphasizing the ultimate dignity of human beings and social justice
Rawls's concept of justice includes the original position, where individuals under the veil of ignorance make fair choices and decisions based on justice as fairness
Every individual is inviolable in Rawls's Theory of Justice, and the greater good should not justify the loss of freedom for others
When faced with two erroneous laws, one should choose the one that is less harmful
An act of injustice can be tolerated if it is necessary to avoid an even greater injustice
An erroneous theory is tolerable in the absence of a good one
In a case of tolerable erroneous theory, it must be carried out for the sake of those supposedly benefited or affected by it
When given 2 erroneous laws, one should choose the better and the less erroneous one
A wrong or unjust law is better than no law at all
Individual liberties should be restricted to maintain equality of opportunity
Restrictions of individual liberties serve as safeguards against abuses and misuses of one’s freedom against others
Two-fold Principle of Justice:
Equal access to basic human rights and liberties
Guarantees a system of equal rights and liberties for every citizen; prohibits the bartering away of liberty for social and monetary considerations
Example: No citizen may sell his/her right to vote
Fair equality of opportunity and the equal distribution of socio-economic inequalities
Deals more with the distribution of social goods and medical resources than with liberty
A just society is not one in which everyone is equal but is one in which inequalities must be demonstrated to be legitimate
To promote justice in human relations, there are 4 types of duties:
1. Fairness in dealing with others
2. Fidelity
3. Respect for persons
4. Beneficence
Natural Duties:
1. The duty of justice
2. The duty of helping others in need or in jeopardy
3. The duty not to harm or injure others
4. The duty to keep promises
The need to rank duties to prioritize them according to higher and lower categories to resolve possible conflicts
Rawls recommends the legitimacy of paternalism in the medical context
Exploitation deliberately intended to benefit one person or a group of persons is not morally legitimate
Rawls justified the allocation of social resources for the training of medical personnel by the benefits it will give to society
Sanctions the voluntary consent of an individual to become a research subject by virtue of his basic right to decide on what risks he is willing to take with his own life
Introduced the concept of an order of priority with regard to equal access to health care (equal opportunity and equal distribution of socio-medical resources)
Rawls does not permit people in the original position to know their goals, plans, interests, and purposes but only their self-respect, wealth, and rationality
In contrast with his objection against utilitarianism, Rawls’s concept of justice refers to the utility principle of the greatest number
The source of the moral law in Natural Law Ethics is reason itself, directing us towards the good as the goal of our action