OLA 1957

• What act provides statutory duty towards lawful visitors

  2 (2) OLA 1957
• 3 criteria to prove duty

  •Occupiers

  •Premises

  •Who are lawful visitors?
• Case and Judge definition of Occupier?

  Wheat v E Lacon & Co. Ltd (1966): Lord Denning "sufficient degree of control"
• What is a premises Act and definition?


  s 1 (3) (a) of the 1957 Act: 'fixed or moveable structure, including any vessel, vehicle and aircraft'.
• Relevance of Revill v Newbury


  Case decided occupier is liable for dangerous conditions or conduct that amounted to them not single actions.
• Types of Lawful visitors act and case

  S2 (1)

  Adults

  Children

  Workmen

  Independent contractors
• Types of Adult visitors?

  •Invitees - people who have been invited to enter or who have express permission to be there.

  •Licensees - persons who may have expressed or implied permission to be on the land for a particular period.

  •Those with contractual permission

  •Those given a statutory right of entry
• Adult visitor must be? Case?

  S2(2) - Reasonably safe. Laverton v Kiapasha Takeaway Supreme
• Child visitor Allurment meaning and cases?

  Occupier must guard against Allurments Glasgow Corporation v Taylor
• What case decides that the allurment must be foreseeable

  Jolley v London Borough

  of Sutton
• When can workmen not claim OLA?

  s2 (3) (b) of the 1957 Act Workmen cannot claim OLA for a incident related to their profession.

  Roles v Nathan (1963)
• Workman must be?

  Competent Bottomley v

  Todmoreden Cricket Club (2003):
• Occupier must test what of workman?

  Their work Woodward v

  The Mayor of Hastings
• What is an extra defence only available to OLA?

  Warning notices
• Warning must be act and case?

  S2 (4) enough to enable the visitor to be reasonably safe

  
  

  Rae v mars (UK) Ltd (1990):
• Warning notice cannot exlude liability from negligence

  S65 Consumer Rights Act 2015