If someone knows a lot about a subject they’re less likely to conform that someone who isn’t an expert
What is an issue for the expertise factor for conformity
No single factor to explain conformity
What is conformity
A change in a persons behaviour or opinions as the result of real or imagined group pressure
What is social factor
Factors that influence us from the social situation
What do we mean by external locus of control
these people have a tendency to believe that things happen without their own control
What is an internal locus of control
The belief that the things that happen are largely controlled by themselves
How does locus of control affect conformity
People who have an internal locus of control are more likely to be able to resist the pressure to conform. If a person takes personal responsibility they’re more likely to base decisions on their beliefs not conform
Explain research to support the relationship between locus of control and conformity
Internal locus of control leads to lower conformity. When asked to rate cartoons, Burger and Cooper found that participants with a high desire for control were less likely to agree with confederates ratings
What is an issue for the locus of control factor for conformity
1966, locus of control does not seem to have an effect on conformity in familiar situations. Ritter found when you are in a new situations then your locus of control will be important. However, in a familiar situations levels of conformity are less affected.
Cognitive style
Like things to be black and white, rigid cognitive style
What is normative social influence
Conformity for social approval and acceptance and to avoid rejection
What is informational social insurance
Changing your behaviour to fit the group because you assume they have a better knowledge
What is prosocial behaviour
Acting in a way that promotes the welfare of others
What is the evaluation for similarity to others in prosocial behaviour
Similarity may increase helping but for example if someone in a football shirt needs help, people who support the same team will probably help
What is meant by cost of helping in pro social Behaviour
Decision of whether to help depends on cost. Cost of helping includes, danger to self or embarrassment. Cost of not helping includes, guilt, blame, leaving another in need. cost-reward model, balance between costs and rewards of helping
What is it ment by presence of others in prosocial behaviour
Bystander effect states that the more people present the less likely people are to help. Darley and Hatańe asked participants to have a discussion on an intercom with others. one had an epileptic seizure and asked for help, if alone 85% reported but only 31% if they thought others were there
What is the evaluation for cost of helping prosocial behaviour
Help also depends on how the situation is interpreted, e.g. A man and women argued in public and 65% intervened when the women shouted I don’t know you but only 19% when shouting I don’t know why I married you
what Do we mean by social factors
Explanation for conformity in terms of the social world around us. your social world is the group of people you identify with
What is genetic state
We feel No responsibly as we’re doing what we’ve been asked to do
What is an autonomous state
Making your own decisions so feeling responsible for your actions
What is an agenic shift
The change from an autonomous state to an agent is state
What is dispositional factor
factors that come from within us
Dispositional factor
Attributes of an individual which can be used to explain why they behave in a particular way this could be their personality, genes or their political ideals
What is a dispositional explanation
Use these factors such as personality or a disorder to explain behaviour and why some people will behave in a particular way which others won’t
What does bystander behaviour mean
help won’t be given in an emergency situation around other people because they think someone else will do it
Authoritarian personality
Someone who is independent, obedient, has rigid views, hostile towards lower status
What is scapegoating
Freud suggested that people who have hostility displace this onto others who are socially inferior In a process called scapegoating you offload anger only something else reliving anxiety and hostility
What do we mean by the term confederate
someone who knows the aim of the short and acts as a participant to help the study
What are the aims of Milgrams study
To see if people would obey an unreasonable order
What was the method of Milgrams study
40 males volunteered for a study in memory aged 20-50. The learner was strapped in a chair and wired with electrodes which could give an electric shock. Every time the leaner got it wrong they were shocked and each time it went up 15, it went from 15-450
What was the results of Milgrams study
No participants stopped before 300V, 5 people stopped at 300V because the learner pounded on the wall, 65% continued to 450V participants showed extreme tension And 3 had seizures
What was the conclusion of Milgrams study
Obedience has little to do with disposition. Factors in the situation made it difficult to disobey
One strength of Milgrams agency theory
His theory has supporting evidence as his study proved that people will go along as long as they’re not responsible for what happened due to a shift in state
One weakness of Milgrams agency theory
It doesn’t explain why there isn’t 100% obedience. 35% of people didn’t fully obey
One weakness of Milgrams agency theory
It excuses people who blindly follow orders. David Mandel claims it is offensive to holocaust survivors to suggest the Nazis were just following orders and ignored the racism
What were the aims of Piliavins study
To investigate if characteristics affect wether people help
What is Piliavins method
A team of 4 student did 103 trials and boarded at the same stop at New York City subway. In 38 trials the victim was an alcoholic, 65 trials they app disabled. The victim would stand next to a pole in the middle of the critical area then collapse after 70 seconds and wait. Two researches would watch and record how long it took for people to help and then the other would be the model that would step in and help if nobody helped after 70-150 seconds
What were Piliavins results
When he appeared disabled 95% of the time he got help when drunk only 50%. When disabled the victim got helped within 70 seconds 80% of the time but only 17% of the time when drunk